Two Horizontal Forces Working On an Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter richard karn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Horizontal
AI Thread Summary
Two horizontal forces act on a 3.0 kg body on a frictionless floor: 9.0 N east and 9.4 N at 68° north of west. The net force calculation initially led to an acceleration of 1.83 m/s², but the correct answer is 3.34 m/s². The confusion arises from the interpretation of the forces, particularly the angle of the second force, which affects both x and y components. Despite the problem stating only horizontal forces, the angled force introduces a vertical component that complicates the analysis. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in problem wording regarding the forces' directions.
richard karn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Only two horizontal forces act on a 3.0 kg body that can move over a frictionless floor. One force is 9.0 N, acting due east, and the other is 9.4 N, acting 68° north of west. What is the magnitude of the body's acceleration?

Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



Fnet= 9 - 9.4cos(68) = 5.47869

F=ma
5.47869= 3.0 * a
a=1.826232

The right answer is 3.34 though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer agrees with mine.
 
I disagree. Fnetx is that, yes, but you forgot about Fnety.

(I'm calling East-West the x direction, and North-South the y-direction).
 
thanks. i was thinking as the other force as pushing into the ground so it wouldn't be accelerating in that direction but then

but 9.4sin(68)/3=2.905

and sqrt(2.905^2+1.8^2) = 3.4
 
Hmm, the object with a 3 kg mass has a weight force of about 30 N acting down. How can it have acceleration in the y direction?? Then again the problem notes there are only 2 horizontal forces acting, but one of them is neither horizontal nor vertical, it is at an angle. Strangely worded problem. Maybe the object and floor are in a zero g or apparent zero g field? That still doesn't explain the 'horiziotal' force acting 68 degrees north of west.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top