Ultrasound vs Normal Waves for Sea Depth Measurement: Why Ultrasound is Superior

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction Waves
AI Thread Summary
Ultrasound is superior to normal waves for sea depth measurement due to its smaller wavelength, which allows for less diffraction and more focused energy on the seabed. This concentration enhances accuracy in depth readings. Additionally, ultrasound waves maintain their amplitude better than ordinary waves, leading to more reliable results. While ordinary waves have limited range and rapidly decreasing amplitude, ultrasound can travel further in water, making it more effective for depth measurement. Overall, the properties of ultrasound make it a preferred choice for accurate sea depth assessment.
jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Waves with small wavelengths diffract less than those with longer wavelengths. Use this information to suggest why ultrasound is much better than ordinary waves for finding the depth of the sea [3 marks]

Homework Equations


NONE

The Attempt at a Solution


Ultrasound has a smaller wavelength than normal waves - hence wave is more concentrated on sea bed.

4. Problems

The mark scheme includes the following two, extra, factors
- amplitude decreases rapidly
- range limited / cannot travel far.

I presume that the last to factors refer to ordinary wavesIs this next sentences correct:
"the amplitude (energy) of an ultrasound wave decreases less rapidly than that of a normal wave - hence results will be more accurate and more responsive. Furthermore, ultrasound can travel further in water than normal waves"
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this stuff correct?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top