Understanding Cofficient of Drag

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dieseltwitch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how to calculate drag using the coefficient of drag formula from NASA. The formula requires specific units for density, velocity, and reference area to yield meaningful results. A user is confused about the units, particularly for density, and questions whether different units should be used for each variable. Dimensional analysis indicates that drag should be expressed in force units, but the user struggles with the appropriate unit conversions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent units in calculations and suggests consulting additional resources for clarity.
Dieseltwitch
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Ok so i have looked and looked for a simple way to under stand how to find drag using the coefficient of drag.

the formula i found is off of NASA website and it reads

Drag = Coefficient * [ (Density * Velocity ^2)* .5 ] * reference area

here is my question
what units do i use.
When i set it up with these numbers
CD = 0.31 (unitless i know)
Ref Area = 8 sq ft (ruff guess)
Velocity = 75 fps
density = 24 in Hg

I end up with 167,400. but i know no clue as to what unit that is? should i be putting every thing in with different units... what is the end units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would do dimensional analysis.
 
At the risk of sounding like a moron... HUH?
 
Can you post a link to the site? Doing a quick dimensional analysis gives a consistent result:

[drag] = ML/T^2 (force, M = mass, L = length, T = time)

but you have odd units of density: pressure? It should be M/L^3
 
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/drageq.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please google dimensional analysis.


Hint: You can find this also in any chemistry book.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top