Understanding Cofficient of Drag

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dieseltwitch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how to calculate drag using the coefficient of drag formula from NASA. The formula requires specific units for density, velocity, and reference area to yield meaningful results. A user is confused about the units, particularly for density, and questions whether different units should be used for each variable. Dimensional analysis indicates that drag should be expressed in force units, but the user struggles with the appropriate unit conversions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent units in calculations and suggests consulting additional resources for clarity.
Dieseltwitch
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Ok so i have looked and looked for a simple way to under stand how to find drag using the coefficient of drag.

the formula i found is off of NASA website and it reads

Drag = Coefficient * [ (Density * Velocity ^2)* .5 ] * reference area

here is my question
what units do i use.
When i set it up with these numbers
CD = 0.31 (unitless i know)
Ref Area = 8 sq ft (ruff guess)
Velocity = 75 fps
density = 24 in Hg

I end up with 167,400. but i know no clue as to what unit that is? should i be putting every thing in with different units... what is the end units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would do dimensional analysis.
 
At the risk of sounding like a moron... HUH?
 
Can you post a link to the site? Doing a quick dimensional analysis gives a consistent result:

[drag] = ML/T^2 (force, M = mass, L = length, T = time)

but you have odd units of density: pressure? It should be M/L^3
 
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/drageq.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please google dimensional analysis.


Hint: You can find this also in any chemistry book.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top