Understanding Heisenberg's Principle: x and p instead of delta x and p

bubblewrap
Messages
134
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I don't get how you can use x and p instead of delta x and p in Heisenberg's principle.
Also why is it just h bar? Isn't it supposed to be h bar/2?
Problem 2-iv

Homework Equations


delta x* delta p >= h bar/2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to deal with this problem but I couldn't find a way, when I looked at the solution it use the Heisenberg's principle without the deltas, I can't understand how this could be done
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
There's quite a few versions of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. ##\Delta x \Delta p \geq h \ \text{or}\ \geq \hbar \ \text{or}\ \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} ## are the main 3 that I'm aware of, at least for position momentum uncertainty. The last reported (most accurate) that I remember was hbar over 2, but they may use a different version, depending on how old the documents are.

I also don't see where you're talking about. I just skimmed through the solutions, but everywhere that I noticed them speaking of uncertainty they either used ##\delta x \ \text{&}\ \delta p \ \text{or} \ \Delta x \ \text{&}\ \Delta p ##
Which problem are you referring to?

Edit** Somehow I missed 2.iv -.-

They're not talking about uncertainty. They're talking about the total energy of the ground state. The ground state should never be lower than 1 quantum.

So I believe that the measured values of x and p in the ground state should be of the order of the uncertainty principle. There may be more to the story, if so, someone else would have to jump in and inform us. I'm not a huge quantum guy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bubblewrap
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
There's quite a few versions of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. ##\Delta x \Delta p \geq h \ \text{or}\ \geq \hbar \ \text{or}\ \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} ## are the main 3 that I'm aware of, at least for position momentum uncertainty. The last reported (most accurate) that I remember was hbar over 2, but they may use a different version, depending on how old the documents are.

I also don't see where you're talking about. I just skimmed through the solutions, but everywhere that I noticed them speaking of uncertainty they either used ##\delta x \ \text{&}\ \delta p \ \text{or} \ \Delta x \ \text{&}\ \Delta p ##
Which problem are you referring to?

Edit** Somehow I missed 2.iv -.-

They're not talking about uncertainty. They're talking about the total energy of the ground state. The ground state should never be lower than 1 quantum.

So I believe that the measured values of x and p in the ground state should be of the order of the uncertainty principle. There may be more to the story, if so, someone else would have to jump in and inform us. I'm not a huge quantum guy.

What's 1 quantum? is it the Planck constant?
 
Basically, yea. It's the increment that your energy scale progresses by.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top