Understanding Malus Law and Polaroid Intensity: Conceptual Doubts

AI Thread Summary
Malus's Law states that the intensity of polarized light passing through a polarizer is given by I = I0 cos²(theta), where theta is the angle between the light's polarization direction and the polarizer's axis. When theta equals 0 degrees, the expected intensity should be I = I0, but the confusion arises because the initial intensity I0 is often considered after passing through an unpolarized source, which loses half its intensity, resulting in I = I0/2 after the first polarizer. The discussion also includes a diagram illustrating the intensity changes through multiple polarizers, emphasizing that the first polarizer reduces the intensity by half. The conceptual doubt revolves around understanding the initial conditions of intensity and the implications of unpolarized light. Clarifying these points resolves the confusion regarding the application of Malus's Law.
Suyash Singh

Homework Statement


It is just a conceptual doubt

Homework Equations


According to malus law intensity of light through polaroid is
I=(Io)cos^2(theta) where theta is the angle between axis of polaroid and incident light.

The Attempt at a Solution


But when Theta=0 then I=Io but in my book it is I=Io/2.
why??

and also is my diagram below correct?

--->(light)(I) [](polaroid) --->(I/2) [] --->(I/4) (theta=0 degrees for both polaroid)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##I_o## is generally taken to be the intensity of the light after an unpolarized source has passed through one polarizer (hence polarizing it). Half of intensity of the source is lost by the first polarization.

Take a look at the diagram for the Law of Malus entry on the Hyperphysics web site:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/polcross.html#c1
 
Thankyou :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top