How do two aligned Polaroids transmit light in Grade 12 physics problems?

AI Thread Summary
In Grade 12 physics, two aligned Polaroids transmit light with a specific absorption rate. Each Polaroid transmits 40% of nonpolarized light, but due to absorption, they actually allow only 32% to pass through when aligned. This is calculated by recognizing that each Polaroid absorbs 20% of the light it should transmit, leading to a combined transmission of 32%. The confusion arises from the application of Malus' Law, which is not needed here since the filters are aligned. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving related problems in physics.
moonpearl
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Grade 12 physics problems :(

One question:

Because of absorption, a Polaroid will actually transmit 40% of nonpolarized light incident on it. Two such Polaroids with their axes aligned will transmit
a. 16%.
b. 24%.
c. 30%.
d. 32%.
e. 40%.

The answer is 32% and I have no cue why. My textbook doesn't say anything and since I am taking a conceptual physics course, I have no formulas to work with. Does anyone know why this is the answer?

Thanks,
LA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An ideal polarizer will let 50% of the unpolarized light through.
These polarizers in the problem are not ideal, they absorb a fraction/percentage of the light they should let through. Can you find this fraction to be 0.8?

After that, since the light which went through the first polarizer is now linearly polarized in the direction of the second polarizer, the second polarizer should let all light through if it was ideal. But it again stops 80% if the light which is incident upon it.
 


Hi LA, understanding polarization can be a challenging concept in physics. In this case, the answer can be found by applying Malus' Law, which states that the intensity of light transmitted through two polarizing filters is equal to the intensity of the incident light times the cosine squared of the angle between the filters. In this problem, the angle between the two polarizing filters is 0 degrees (since their axes are aligned), so the cosine of 0 degrees is 1. Plugging this into the equation, we get: I = (40%)(1^2) = 40%. However, the question is asking for the percentage of nonpolarized light transmitted, so we need to multiply this by 100% - which gives us 40% x 100% = 40%. Therefore, the correct answer is 40% x 40% = 16%, which is option a. Hope this helps clarify the solution for you. Keep up the good work in your conceptual physics course!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top