Understanding Rigid Body Rotation & Angular Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sucks@Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
AI Thread Summary
When a rigid body rotates about a fixed axis, all points experience the same angular acceleration due to the uniform application of torque. The relationship between torque and angular acceleration is expressed through the equation τ = Iα, where I is the moment of inertia and α is the angular acceleration. This uniformity occurs because the body is treated as a single entity in classical mechanics, with properties averaged across its constituent particles. The assumption of no deformation allows for this simplification, leading to a consistent angular acceleration for the entire body. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing rotational dynamics in physics.
Sucks@Physics
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
When a rigid body rotates about a fixed axis al the points in the body have the same angular acceleration. But why does the body as a whole have the same angular acceleration. just kinda of trying to understand

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But why does the body as a whole have the same angular acceleration. Body rotates when a torque is applied to it. A torque is given by rXmi*a = mi*ri^2*alpha where mi is the mass of a particle at a distance ri from the axis.And alpha is the angular acceleration which is constant for all paricals. Total torque = sigma(mi*ri^2*)alpha = I*alpha
 
If I understand your question correctly: that's the name we give it. If all points in a body have the same angular acceleration (such that no deformations etc. occur) we say that the body (as a whole) has a certain angular acceleration. It's what we often do in (classical) mechanics: we speak of properties of a body or its center of mass (velocity, angular momentum, etc) considering it as an atomic object, forgetting it is actually built out of smaller particles which all have that property (technically, I should add "on average" here, but that's outside the point I'm making).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top