Understanding Torque Balance and Center of Gravity in a See-Saw

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wasseem92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing a see-saw with an off-center fulcrum and determining the positions of weights needed for equilibrium. A 30 kg see-saw with a fulcrum located 2/3 of its length requires a 20 kg child to sit at a distance of (1/4)L from the fulcrum to achieve balance. The center of mass of the see-saw is considered to be at its midpoint, which is why the torque calculation starts with a distance of (L/6) from the fulcrum. This approach simplifies the analysis by treating the see-saw's mass as concentrated at its center of mass. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
Wasseem92
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A poorly constructed see-saw has a fulcrum 2/3 of the way along its length. a) If the see-saw weighs 30 kg, where would a 20 kg child have to sit in order to balance the see-saw? b) What is the least mass that a child must have in order to balance the see-saw?
well i tried solving this question and my teacher gave this as a solution:

The center of gravity of the see-saw is assumed to be in the center, assuming that it is uniform. The force diagram is therefore as shown below. mss = 30 kg is the mass of the see-saw, mc = 20 kg is the mass of the child, and L is the length of the see-saw.

Figure 8.3: Problem 8.1


In order to find the distance x from the child to the fulcrum we can do a torque balance about the fulcrum:
sum of torque = (L/6)mssg - xmcg = 0

so that
x = (L*mss)/(6*mc) = = (1/4) L.


My question is: why did he start of with a distance of (L/6). Please i need help, this really baffles me.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Wasseem92! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Wasseem92 said:
My question is: why did he start of with a distance of (L/6).

Because L/6 is the distance from the fulcrum to the centre of mass of the seesaw …

you can regard the whole mass of the seesaw as concentrated at its centre of mass. :smile:

(in fact, that's exactly why the centre of mass is defined, and is called that! :wink:)
 
alright man thank you a lot! that really helped!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top