Understanding Torque Balance and Center of Gravity in a See-Saw

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wasseem92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing a see-saw with an off-center fulcrum and determining the positions of weights needed for equilibrium. A 30 kg see-saw with a fulcrum located 2/3 of its length requires a 20 kg child to sit at a distance of (1/4)L from the fulcrum to achieve balance. The center of mass of the see-saw is considered to be at its midpoint, which is why the torque calculation starts with a distance of (L/6) from the fulcrum. This approach simplifies the analysis by treating the see-saw's mass as concentrated at its center of mass. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
Wasseem92
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A poorly constructed see-saw has a fulcrum 2/3 of the way along its length. a) If the see-saw weighs 30 kg, where would a 20 kg child have to sit in order to balance the see-saw? b) What is the least mass that a child must have in order to balance the see-saw?
well i tried solving this question and my teacher gave this as a solution:

The center of gravity of the see-saw is assumed to be in the center, assuming that it is uniform. The force diagram is therefore as shown below. mss = 30 kg is the mass of the see-saw, mc = 20 kg is the mass of the child, and L is the length of the see-saw.

Figure 8.3: Problem 8.1


In order to find the distance x from the child to the fulcrum we can do a torque balance about the fulcrum:
sum of torque = (L/6)mssg - xmcg = 0

so that
x = (L*mss)/(6*mc) = = (1/4) L.


My question is: why did he start of with a distance of (L/6). Please i need help, this really baffles me.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Wasseem92! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Wasseem92 said:
My question is: why did he start of with a distance of (L/6).

Because L/6 is the distance from the fulcrum to the centre of mass of the seesaw …

you can regard the whole mass of the seesaw as concentrated at its centre of mass. :smile:

(in fact, that's exactly why the centre of mass is defined, and is called that! :wink:)
 
alright man thank you a lot! that really helped!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top