Understanding Vector Components: Explaining an Inclined Plane Physics Question

AI Thread Summary
Understanding vector components in physics requires clarity on angle measurement. When breaking down a force vector, sine and cosine functions are associated with the y-axis and x-axis, respectively, but this depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or y-axis. If the angle is from the x-axis, the relationships mg cos theta = ma sub x and mg sin theta = ma sub y are correct. To avoid confusion, it's recommended to use standard angle measurement where the positive x-axis is zero, ensuring consistent associations of cosine with x and sine with y. This approach simplifies the understanding of vector components in inclined plane problems.
micaele
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
So I was watching some of those physics videos posted in schoolwork board, and although he probably didn't make an error here, I don't think I understand it.

Here's the pictues. I'll elaborate after it so you guys know what I'm talking about:

http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6632/88907417sb7.png When he broke the downward mg force into its components (mg cos theta = ma sub x and mg sin theta = ma sub y), shouldn't it be mg sin theta instead, and likewise for the other? I thought that when you break a vector into its parts, sine is associated with the y-axis and cosine for the x.

Maybe I'm having a brain fart, but I swear I had those vector components figured out.

Thanks ahead of time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Draw a picture and work out the geometery. Your understanding of sin and cos is fundamentally wrong.

see "Right triangle definitions"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_function

Hopefully, you can work that out for yourself given the link.
 
micaele said:
I thought that when you break a vector into its parts, sine is associated with the y-axis and cosine for the x.

It depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or from the y-axis. If the angle is measured from the x-axis, what you wrote is correct. If the angle is measured from the y-axis, it's the other way around.
 
jtbell said:
It depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or from the y-axis. If the angle is measured from the x-axis, what you wrote is correct. If the angle is measured from the y-axis, it's the other way around.

THAT'S the reason!

Thank you, that completely did not occur to me. I understand now, thanks.
 
One of the easiest (not fastest) ways to avoid this difficulty is to always use standard angle measurement (where the + x-axis is 0). Then x is always associated with cos and y is always associated with sin and the +s and -s take care of themselves.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top