Understanding Velocity in Waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Screen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass per unit length of a guitar string vibrating at 110 Hz with a length of 0.648 m and tension of 100 N. The user initially questioned why the wave velocity calculated from the string's tension and mass per unit length is significantly lower than the speed of sound in air (approximately 343 m/s). It was clarified that the velocity in this context refers specifically to the wave speed along the vibrating string, which is influenced by the string's tension and mass per unit length. The user ultimately expresses understanding of the concept after the clarification. The conversation highlights the distinction between wave velocity in different media.
Screen
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was told that a string on a guitar vibrates at a frequency of 110 Hz. The length of the string is .648 m and the tension is 100 N. I was told to find the mass per unit length, μ, of the string. Although I got the correct answer, I was wondering why my initial attempt was incorrect (shown below).

Homework Equations


f_{n} = \frac{n}{2L}v

v = \sqrt{\frac{T}{μ}}

The Attempt at a Solution


dakdX.jpg


(Sorry for the formatting, I don't type in latex really quickly).

In this case, if it's a guitar, why is the velocity of the wave not equivalent to 345 m/s (343.2 m/s)? Why is it so much lower (142.56 m/s)?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, is the velocity referring to the velocity of the vibrating string?

I think I understand now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top