Unlock the Mystery of Hooke's Law: Stress Proportional to Strain

AI Thread Summary
Hooke's Law states that stress is proportional to strain within the elastic limit, indicating a direct relationship between load and deformation. The mathematical explanation involves a Taylor series expansion, showing that generalized displacement is proportional to generalized force at small displacements. Physically, this proportionality occurs because stretching an object alters atomic bonds, creating a restoring force that returns atoms to their equilibrium positions. In elastomers, this effect is further complicated by the entropic nature of polymer chains. Understanding these principles clarifies the underlying reasons for Hooke's Law.
koolraj09
Messages
166
Reaction score
5
Hi guys.
Hooke's Law is stated as: Stress is proportional to strain within elastic limit (or load proportional to deformation).
But I can't really figure out why this happens. I mean what is the cause of this proportionality?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not sure whether you're interested in the math reason or the physical reason. Math reason: every generalized "displacement" (e.g., distance or strain) is proportional to generalized "force" (e.g., load or stress) for small displacements, as can be shown by a Taylor series expansion,

f(x_0+\Delta x)\approx f(x_0)+f^\prime(x_0)\Delta x

where the first term is zero because x_0 is the equilibrium position.

Physical reason: pulling on something stretches atomic bonds* and induces a restoring force so that the atoms can go back to their equilibrium spacing.

*Or straightens polymer chains, in elastomers, where the restoring force is entropic. (This is a more advanced topic.)
 
Mapes said:
Physical reason: pulling on something stretches atomic bonds* and induces a restoring force so that the atoms can go back to their equilibrium spacing.

*Or straightens polymer chains, in elastomers, where the restoring force is entropic. (This is a more advanced topic.)

I think he were looking for this answer! Great explanation.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Back
Top