Use Newton's second law to find the net force acting on both blocks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of two connected blocks using Newton's second law, considering the effects of kinetic friction. Initially, the user incorrectly calculated the acceleration and final velocity without accounting for friction. After clarification on the forces acting on each block, including the friction force on the upper block, the user recalculated the acceleration and found the correct final speed. The importance of incorporating the coefficient of kinetic friction in the calculations was emphasized. The final correct speed of the blocks after moving 47.0 cm was determined to be 2.388 m/s.
Zhalfirin88
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks with masses m1 = 1.10 kg and m2 = 3.20 kg are connected by a massless string. They are released from rest. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the upper block and the surface is 0.490. Assume that the pulley has a negligible mass and is frictionless, and calculate the speed of the blocks after they have moved a distance 47.0 cm.

Hint: Use Newton's second law to find the net force acting on both blocks. Since they are connected by a string, they act as one body and have the same acceleration.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I did that, but ended up wrong.

\Sigma F = ma

-f_k + mg = ma Because the tension forces would cancel.

\frac{-(1.1kg * 9.8\frac{m}{s^2}) + (3.20kg * 9.8\frac{m}{s^2})}{(1.1kg + 3.2kg)}

a = 4.786 \frac{m}{s^2}

v_f^2 = v_o^2 + 2a\Delta x

v_f = \sqrt{2 * 4.786\frac{m}{s^2} * .47m}

v_f = 2.12 \frac{m}{s}

But this was wrong, so where did I go wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It looks like you had friction in your equation (-fk) but did nothing with it. I think you calculated the velocity of the blocks without any friction.

To be honest, I don't really understand the problem. What does it mean by 'between the upper block and the surface'?
 


Well we had a picture, and I don't know how to transfer it over. Basically m1 is on a surface with a string attached to m2. m2 isn't on a surface. The only forces acting on m2 are mg pulling it down and the tension pulling it up.

Think of a cliff, where m1 is on the cliff and m2 is not on the cliff.

Edit: Aha! found a picture

http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys311/workshops/w5b/level_atwood/cart_and_weight.gif
 


Yeah, that was my assumption. = ), just wanted to be clear, especially that the upper block=m1.

Try finding the force of friction applied to m1.

Fk=uk*FN

This is the force applied opposite to the direction of m1's motion.
 


<br /> \frac{-(1.1kg * 9.8\frac{m}{s^2} * .49) + (3.20kg * 9.8\frac{m}{s^2})}{(1.1kg + 3.2kg)} <br />

<br /> a = 6.065 \frac{m}{s^2} <br />

<br /> v_f^2 = v_o^2 + 2a\Delta x <br /> <br /> v_f = \sqrt{2 * 6.065\frac{m}{s^2} * .47m} <br />

v_f = 2.388 \frac{m}{s} And that was correct! Just forgot to multiply by the coefficient of friction, thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top