User_6Calculating G-Forces on Amusement Park Ride

  • Thread starter Thread starter iMac_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    G-forces
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the G-Forces experienced on an amusement park ride, the user is using the formula g's = a / 9.8m/s, resulting in 0.52g from an acceleration of 5.1m/s². This calculation is correct, but it does not account for the ambient 1g force acting on the rider. Depending on the direction of acceleration, the total G-Force could be 1.52g if vertical or approximately 1.13g if horizontal. The discussion highlights the importance of considering both the acceleration and the direction to understand the total G-Force experienced. Accurate calculations are crucial for assessing rider safety and comfort.
iMac_
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the G-Forces a rider will experience whilst riding an amusement park ride.

The track is 200m long and the 'pod' (What the rider is in) accelerates uniformly at a rate I found to be 5.1m/s2.

So, to calculate the G-Force, I planned to use the formula g's = a / 9.8m/s, but this gives me a value of 0.52g, which I found unlikely.

Would anyone be able to point out my error, because I'm fairly certain it's a mistake on my part.
Thanks
-iMac_
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iMac_ said:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the G-Forces a rider will experience whilst riding an amusement park ride.

The track is 200m long and the 'pod' (What the rider is in) accelerates uniformly at a rate I found to be 5.1m/s2.

So, to calculate the G-Force, I planned to use the formula g's = a / 9.8m/s, but this gives me a value of 0.52g, which I found unlikely.

The calculation is correct, but remember this is in addition to the ambient 1g, and you haven't said which direction the acceleration is. If the acceleration is straight up then we have a total of 1.52g; if horizontal then √(12+0.522) = 1.13g.
It doesn't seem much to you because you're so accustomed to the 1g. Consider how it feels when you stand on your head. If memory serves, red-out occurs at about -5g and blackout at +7g.
OTOH, maybe your 5.1 is wrong?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top