Using the angular momentum principle for 2 pucks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two pucks on ice connected by a string, where one puck moves without rotating and the other both moves and rotates when a force is applied. It is established that the centers of both pucks travel the same distance due to the equal external force acting on their centers of mass. The calculation for the ratio of distances moved by the two pucks involves understanding the relationship between linear and angular motion, specifically using the angular momentum principle. The second puck's movement incorporates angular displacement, leading to the conclusion that the distance moved by the end of the string attached to it is twice that of the first puck. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between the distances in the lab frame and the distances related to the pucks' motion.
shepherd882
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two pucks are lying on ice where they can slide and rotate with almost no friction. A string is tied to both pucks but it is tied to the middle of the first puck and wrapped around the second puck. You pull on both strings with the same force, F. The first puck moves without rotating while the second puck moves and rotates.
media%2F842%2F8428100b-d401-4c50-a9f5-ad1d4c933fff%2FphphHWdvo.png


a) The centres of both pucks will travel the same distance. Explain clearly why that is so.
b) Calculate the ratio of the total distance L that the end of the string attached to the second puck moved to the total distance d that the end of the string attached to the first puck moved. Beware that this is NOT a rolling without slipping problem and the relationship between angular speed and centre of mass speed may be different than in that case. There are at least two methods of solving this problem but they both require using the angular momentum principle. One method calculates the two types of kinetic energy and another method calculates the angle through which the second puck rotates.

Homework Equations


F=ma
Torque = I*w
I=0.5MR^2
Angular displacement = 0.5*a*t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


a) treat each puck as point-particle system. the external force (F) acting on the centre of mass for both pucks are the same. The centre of mass has a = F/m therefore distance traveled by both pucks is:
d=1/2*a*t^2
d= 1/2*F/M*t^2
b) for puck 2:
46502154_195563131368204_8563079905254834176_n.png?_nc_cat=107&_nc_ht=scontent.fyvr3-1.png

Divide angular displacement/distance:
R*angular displacement = 2D
(L=R*angular displacement)
Therefore, L=2D

not sure if this is right and for puck 1, how do you do it for slipping?

thanks for your help
 

Attachments

  • media%2F842%2F8428100b-d401-4c50-a9f5-ad1d4c933fff%2FphphHWdvo.png
    media%2F842%2F8428100b-d401-4c50-a9f5-ad1d4c933fff%2FphphHWdvo.png
    19 KB · Views: 673
  • 46502154_195563131368204_8563079905254834176_n.png?_nc_cat=107&_nc_ht=scontent.fyvr3-1.png
    46502154_195563131368204_8563079905254834176_n.png?_nc_cat=107&_nc_ht=scontent.fyvr3-1.png
    16.4 KB · Views: 740
Physics news on Phys.org
shepherd882 said:
R*angular displacement
In terms of the set-up, what distance does this calculation represent?
 
haruspex said:
In terms of the set-up, what distance does this calculation represent?

the distance that the string is pulled on puck 2?
 
shepherd882 said:
the distance that the string is pulled on puck 2?
It depends what you mean by that. It is not the distance that the pulled end travels in the lab frame.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top