Using the sin function for a problem with a frictionless pulley and an incline

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about using the sine function for calculating tension in a frictionless pulley system with inclined planes, participants explore the rationale behind using sine instead of cosine. The sine function is necessary to determine the component of weight acting parallel to the slope, which is crucial for understanding the motion of the blocks. Participants emphasize the importance of resolving forces into components based on the angle of inclination, noting that sine relates to the opposite side of the triangle formed by the weight vector. A misunderstanding of trigonometric principles is addressed, highlighting that simply using the total weight without considering components leads to incorrect conclusions. Ultimately, the conversation reinforces the significance of trigonometry in mechanics for accurately analyzing forces in inclined systems.
sentimentaltrooper
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A system comprising blocks, a light frictionless pulley, a frictionless incline, and connecting ropes is shown in the figure. The 9.0-kg block accelerates downward when the system is released from rest. The tension in the rope connecting the 6.0 kg block and the 4.0 kg block is closest to
Relevant Equations
[itex](m_2 + m_1)a - Ma = Mg - m_2 gsin\theta - m_1 gsin\theta[/itex]
image?k=fc77d489804f17f65c75a97e435e4076.jpg

To find the tension in the rope connecting 6.0 kg block and 4.0 kg block we do
6.0 kg = m1, 4.0 kg = m2, 9.0 kg = M
(m_2 + m_1)a - Ma = Mg - m_2 gsin\theta - m_1 gsin\theta

Why do we use sin in these equations and not cos?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sentimentaltrooper said:
Why do we use sin in these equations and not cos?
Please explain why you think it would be cos.
 
Another student that hasn't been introduced to the basics of trigonometry before taking the course in mechanics...
Do you know how the cosine and sine of an angle of a right triangle are defined?
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
There are some of us (I am one) for whom seeing things in horizontal and vertical is much easier than seeing them at angles like this. But here, if you were to consider motion of the 6kg and 4kg masses horizontally and vertically, you'd be making things more complicated than they need to be. It's more efficient here to take the components parallel to and perpendicular to the slope. So, what matters here is the component of weight (of the 6kg and 4kg) parallel to the slope, because that's where the motion is, parallel to the slope. This means you need a right angled triangle which has the weight as the hypotenuse. (I usually turn the paper, or my head, to see this better.)

Anyway, try it. Find the component of the weight parallel to the slope and see whether you need the sin, cos or tan of that angle to do so.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
What is the direction of the only effective forces inducing and resisting the movement?
Would the direction of the movement reverse for angles close to 90 degrees?
 
Delta2 said:
Another student that hasn't been introduced to the basics of trigonometry before taking the course in mechanics...
Do you know how the cosine and sine of an angle of a right triangle are defined?
i know the basics of trig
soh cah toa
so sin would be... opposite over hypotenuse... but opposite length of triangle is not even defined here and neither is hypotenuse so what use is this sin ?

The component of weight parallel to slope:
we have 6 kg and 4 kg so just multiply both by 9.8 no?
(6 * 9.8) + (4 * 9.8) = 98 N
 
sentimentaltrooper said:
The component of weight parallel to slope:
we have 6 kg and 4 kg so just multiply both by 9.8 no?
Those are the whole weights, not components in the given direction.
What you seem to be missing is how one uses trig to resolve a force (or any vector) into components.
Try https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-1/Vector-Resolution
 
  • Like
Likes rsk and sentimentaltrooper
haruspex said:
Those are the whole weights, not components in the given direction.
What you seem to be missing is how one uses trig to resolve a force (or any vector) into components.
Try https://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/vectors/Lesson-1/Vector-Resolution
Thank you for this website. I just used it and played through the interactive game.
So I can use square root of x component squared and y component squared to find magnitude.
And I can use head-to-tail method for adding and subtracting vectors.
But where exactly does sin come into play? And how do I know to use sin here and not cos?

I think this differentiation of concept and trig choice would allow me to understand the formula further.
 
sentimentaltrooper said:
Thank you for this website. I just used it and played through the interactive game.
So I can use square root of x component squared and y component squared to find magnitude.
And I can use head-to-tail method for adding and subtracting vectors.
But where exactly does sin come into play? And how do I know to use sin here and not cos?

I think this differentiation of concept and trig choice would allow me to understand the formula further.
The website I linked to before is usually quite good, but looking more at that particular page it could use some improvements. This one looks better:
https://www.wikihow.com/Resolve-a-Vector-Into-Components#Calculating-Components-with-Trigonometry.
The basic rule is: given a vector magnitude X and a vector magnitude Y with an angle A between them, the component of X in the direction of Y is ##X\cos(A)##. Similarly, the component of Y in the direction of X is ##Y\cos(A)##.

Even knowing the rule, picking the wrong one of sine and cos is an easy mistake. I double check by considering an extreme case. E.g. in the problem in this thread, what if the angle were zero? The weights would not exert any tension on the rope, so which of sine and cos gives a result zero for an angle of zero?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Delta2, rsk and sentimentaltrooper

Similar threads

Back
Top