Vector Spaces, Subsets, and Subspaces

mrroboto
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




What is an example of a subset of R^2 which is closed under vector addition and taking additive inverses which is not a subspace of R^2?

R, in this question, is the real numbers.


Homework Equations



I know that, for example, V={(0,0)} is a subset for R^2 that is also a subspace, but I can't figure out how something can be a subset and not a subspace.



The Attempt at a Solution



Does this have anything to do with scalar multiplication being closed on the vector space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the set of all (x,y) where x and y are both integers.
 
So for example, if we let the subset = (a,b) s.t. a,b are elements of Z. Then it is closed under addition but not under scalar multiplication. i.e. Let (a,b) = (1,3) and multiply by 1/2 for example (which is the example we used to figure it out). Then you get (1/2, 3/2), neither of which are in Z.
 
Sure, but it does have additive inverses.
 
Dick said:
Think about the set of all (x,y) where x and y are both integers.

or both rational numbers
 
mrroboto said:

Homework Statement




What is an example of a subset of R^2 which is closed under vector addition and taking additive inverses which is not a subspace of R^2?

R, in this question, is the real numbers.


Homework Equations



I know that, for example, V={(0,0)} is a subset for R^2 that is also a subspace, but I can't figure out how something can be a subset and not a subspace.
It's very easy to be a subset without being a subspace! Just look at any subset that does not satisfy the requirements for a subpace- what about { (1, 0)}?



The Attempt at a Solution



Does this have anything to do with scalar multiplication being closed on the vector space?
In order for a subset to be a subspace, it must be closed under addition, have additive inverses, and be closed under scalar multiplication. Since you are asked about a subset that IS closed under addition and has additive inverses, looks like there is only one thing left!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top