Velocity Addition & Relativity of Simultaneity

In summary: They don't agree on each other's distances.In summary, the conversation discusses a thought experiment where two balls are moving towards an observer from opposite directions. The observer is standing still and the balls are moving at a speed of 0.8 times the speed of light. The observer and the balls will collide at the same time from the observer's perspective, but from the perspective of one of the balls, they will collide at different times. This is due to the relativity of simultaneity and the Lorentz transformation of coordinates. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the fact that different observers will not agree on the distances and times of events in spacetime.
  • #1
IsakVern
8
0
I have some issues understanding the following thought experiment:

Suppose you are standing still, and two balls are moving towards you from opposite direction. From your own reference frame, Ball A is ##10^5## m away from you, moving towards you from the left with speed ##0.8c##, and Ball B is ##10^5## m away from you, moving towards you from the right with speed ##0.8c##. And then (of course), from YOUR reference frame, both balls will hit you at the same time, specifically after

## time = distance/velocity = \frac{10^5 m}{0.8c} = 0.0004167 s = 416.7 μs ##

From the reference frame of Ball A, IT is standing still, and YOU are moving towards it with speed ##0.8c## from the right, and Ball B is moving towards it with speed:

##v_{B} = \frac{0.8c + 0.8c}{1 + (0.8c)^2/c^2} = \frac{1.6c}{1.64c} = 0.97c## .

This means that, from the reference frame of Ball A, YOU collide into Ball A after

##t = \frac{10^5 m}{0.8c} = 416.7 μs## (like we found above)

and Ball B collide into Ball A after

##t = \frac{2 \cdot 10^5 m}{0.97c} = 687.3 μs##,

which means that, from the reference frame of Ball A, the three objects (you, Ball A and Ball B) didn't collide at the same time. And both you AND Ball A would be correct. Is this the accurate way to measure it? Can Ball A (and Ball B for that matter) really claim that the collision didn't occur with all three objects colliding at the same time?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are only transforming the time coordinates of events, not the space coordinates. To do this analysis properly, you need to define both ##x## and ##t## coordinates for all events of interest (there would be four: you at time ##t = 0## in your rest frame, Ball A at time ##t = 0## in your rest frame, Ball B at time ##t = 0## in your rest frame, and the event where all three of you intersect, at time ##t = 416.7 \mu s## in your rest frame).

Then, to find out how things look in the other frames, you need to Lorentz transform the coordinates for all four events. You should find that, in the other frames, you and the two Balls start out at different times (relativity of simultaneity), but still all meet at the same event (because Lorentz transforming one event in your rest frame gives one event in the other frames).
 
  • #3
Here's a diagram I made with my GeoGebra tool: https://www.geogebra.org/m/HYD7hB9v# .
It's an ordinary Minkowski diagram with light-clock diamonds supplementing worldlines (and other segments on a spacetime diagram)
(See my Insight for details: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativity-rotated-graph-paper/ )

I then marked it up with Paint...
(I might have switched A and B... but you can resolve that.)

Let M be the collision event.
For simplicity, let the distance be PQ="8 light seconds" (instead of 10^5 meters) in your frame.
Then the time to collision is PM=##\frac{8\rm {l.s.}}{.8c}=10\rm\ s##. So, PQ/PM=0.8c.

In A's frame, by symmetry, we have P'Q'= -8 and P'M'=10... so P'Q'/P'M'=-0.8c.
(Note PQM and P'Q'M are similar triangles in Minkowski spacetime geometry.)

At that instant in A's frame where you are 8 light-seconds away, where is Ball B according to A?
Locate event Z as the intersection of Ball B's worldline and A's x-axis (which is parallel to the spacelike diagonal of A's diamond).
Count the light-clock diamonds along A's negative x-axis...
graphically, P'Z is about 9.75... light-seconds [not 2*8=16 light-seconds],
in accord with the relative speed of Ball B being about .975c.
upload_2017-3-9_17-55-20.png
 
Last edited:
  • #4
IsakVern said:
This means that, from the reference frame of Ball A ... Ball B collides into Ball A after

##t = \frac{2 \cdot 10^5 m}{0.97c} = 687.3 μs##

I believe your mistake is here.

From YOUR perspective in the middle, Ball A and Ball B are both ##10^5## meters away from you at the same time. Indeed, at any given time, the distance between YOU and Ball A is equal to the distance between YOU and Ball B.

But that's not true from Ball A's perspective. If Ball A says that YOU are ##10^5## meters away, then Ball A does not say that Ball B is ##2 * 10^5## meters away at that moment.

To figure out how far away Ball B was from Ball A (from Ball A's perspective) at precisely the moment when YOU were ##10^5## meters away, make use of the fact that Ball A, Ball B, and YOU must all meet at a single event in spacetime when you collide. Simply dial back Ball A's clock ##416.7## microseconds, to when YOU were ##10^5## meters away from Ball A, and use Ball B's speed (relative to Ball A) to find the distance ##\Delta x## that Ball B traveled during that time:

##\Delta x = v \Delta t = \left( \dfrac{1.6c}{1.64} \right) \left( \dfrac{10^5 m}{0.8c} \right) = \dfrac{50}{41} \cdot 10^5 m##

So from Ball A's perspective, when YOU are 100,000 meters away, Ball B is only about 122,000 meters away.
 

1. What is the concept of velocity addition in relativity?

Velocity addition in relativity refers to the mathematical formula used to calculate the velocity of an object from the perspective of two different observers in relative motion. This formula takes into account the principles of special relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same for all non-accelerating observers.

2. How does velocity addition differ from classical Newtonian physics?

In classical Newtonian physics, velocities are simply added together when objects are moving in the same direction. However, in relativity, the addition of velocities is more complex and takes into account the effects of time dilation and length contraction.

3. What is the relationship between velocity addition and the speed of light?

According to the principles of relativity, the speed of light is constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. This means that the velocity addition formula must be modified when dealing with objects moving at speeds close to the speed of light.

4. What is the concept of relativity of simultaneity?

The relativity of simultaneity refers to the fact that the concept of two events happening at the same time is relative to the observer. In other words, two events that are simultaneous for one observer may not be simultaneous for another observer in relative motion.

5. How does the relativity of simultaneity affect our understanding of time?

The relativity of simultaneity challenges our traditional understanding of time as a universal concept. It suggests that time is relative and can be perceived differently by different observers. This concept is essential in understanding the principles of special relativity and has important implications in fields such as astrophysics and space travel.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
804
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
581
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
54
Views
722
  • Special and General Relativity
7
Replies
221
Views
9K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
669
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
720
Back
Top