Velocity dependent force question

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Velocity
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Initial speed = v, only for acting on it is retarding force F(v) = -Ae^(-cv). Find it's speed as a function of time.




Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


m(dv/dt) = -Ae^(-cv)
dv / (-Ae^(-cv) = dt / m

integrating gives
[e^(-cv)/Ac] = t/m

where the left side of that integral is evaluated from initial vi to final vf

e^(-cvi)/Ac-e^(-cvf)/Ac = t / m

multiplying by AC and taking the natural log of all of this...

-cvf + cvi = ln(tAc/m)
vf = vi - (1/c)*ln(tAc/m)

Does this look correct? An online source says this is wrong. Thanks for the help, LaTex coming soon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, check your signs. Principally, using "separation of variables" is the correct approach to solve this 1st order ODE.
 
PsychonautQQ said:

Homework Statement


Initial speed = v, only for acting on it is retarding force F(v) = -Ae^(-cv). Find it's speed as a function of time.




Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


m(dv/dt) = -Ae^(-cv)
dv / (-Ae^(-cv) = dt / m

integrating gives
[e^(-cv)/Ac] = t/m
You do know that 1/e^{-cv}= e^{cv}, don't you? So simpler is
me^{cv}dv= -Adt
and the integrating
\frac{m}{c}e^{cv}= -At+ C

where the left side of that integral is evaluated from initial vi to final vf

e^(-cvi)/Ac-e^(-cvf)/Ac = t / m

multiplying by AC and taking the natural log of all of this...

-cvf + cvi = ln(tAc/m)
vf = vi - (1/c)*ln(tAc/m)

Does this look correct? An online source says this is wrong. Thanks for the help, LaTex coming soon.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top