Virtual work = 0 implies net torque = 0

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2018-3-24_14-16-33.png


Homework Equations


upload_2018-3-24_14-17-10.png
upload_2018-3-24_14-17-29.png

## \vec \tau = \Sigma \vec r_i \times \vec F_i ##

The Attempt at a Solution


## \vec \tau = \Sigma \vec r_i \times \vec F_i ##

## \delta W = \Sigma F_i \delta x_i ##

Let's take our Cartesian coordinate system such that the axis of rotation becomes its z-axis.

Let's say that the body rotates through an angle ##\theta## so that the displacement ## \vec dx_i = \vec \theta \times \vec r_i ##.

Now, how to calculate virtual displacement?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-3-24_14-16-33.png
    upload_2018-3-24_14-16-33.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 832
  • upload_2018-3-24_14-17-10.png
    upload_2018-3-24_14-17-10.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 829
  • upload_2018-3-24_14-17-29.png
    upload_2018-3-24_14-17-29.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 834
Physics news on Phys.org
This is one that is outside of my area of expertise, but I think you can use a generalized type of coordinate and then write it as ## dW=\tau \, d \theta ## where ## \tau ## is a torque. In more detail, as vectors, it may read ## dW=\vec{\tau} \cdot d \vec{\theta} ## , where ## \vec{\theta }## is along the axis of rotation.
 
Pushoam said:
Let's say that the body rotates through an angle ##\theta## so that the displacement ## \vec dx_i = \vec \theta \times \vec r_i ##.
Now, how to calculate virtual displacement?
Your equation ## \vec dx_i = \vec \theta \times \vec r_i ## is essentially what you need. Imagine the particles of the body undergo virtual displacements corresponding to a virtual rotation ##\delta \theta \, \hat \theta## of the body. What is the corresponding virtual displacement ##\vec {\delta r_i}## of the ##i##th particle?

Note that the virtual work can be written as ##\delta W = \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^N \vec {F_i} \cdot \vec {\delta r_i} ##
 
In writing dxi = theta x ri you are equating a differential quantity with a finite quantity. This cannot be correct.

Instead, write dx = d(theta) x ri, where ri is constant for for each particle.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
It is perhaps worth mentioning that the sum of the forces on a body or system can add to zero, and there can still be a net torque on the system. (For example, two forces of equal magnitude in opposite directions can both be applying a torque in the same direction). Thereby the system is then not at equilibrium, but can be undergoing a change in its angular momentum and rotational energy. The ## \delta W ## from any torques needs to be zero as well to have equilibrium.
 
Charles Link said:
It is perhaps worth mentioning that the sum of the forces on a body or system can add to zero, and there can still be a net torque on the system.

This is most certainly true.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top