What is the electric potential at the center of a ring of charge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at the center of a ring of charge, specifically a plastic rod bent into a circle with a positive and negative charge distribution. Initial calculations for the potentials from each charge segment yielded incorrect results due to misapplication of the charge density formula. Participants highlighted that the electric potential does not depend on the specific distribution of charge along the circumference, as all charges are equidistant from the center. After correcting the charge density and integrating properly, the correct potential was determined. The thread concludes with acknowledgment of the solution and appreciation for the assistance received.
Necraz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Voltage from Ring of Charge

Homework Statement


A plastic rod has been bent into a circle of radius R = 6.40 cm. It has a charge Q1 = +2.40 pC uniformly distributed along one-quarter of its circumference and a charge Q2 = -6Q1 uniformly distributed along the rest of the circumference (Figure 24-39). Take V = 0 at infinity. What is the electric potential at the center C of the circle?


Homework Equations


dV = \frac{dq}{4\pi\epsilon_0r}
\lambda = \frac{q}{L}


The Attempt at a Solution


dq = \lambda r d \theta
\lambda = \frac{q}{2 \pi r}
V = \int_{0}^{\phi}{\frac{\lambda d \theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0}} = \frac{\lambda \phi}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} = \frac{q \phi}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r}
V_1 = \frac{(2.4*10^-12)(\pi / 2)}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = 0.0843V
V_2 = \frac{-6(2.4*10^-12)(3\pi / 2)}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = -1.517V
V_{net} = V_1 + V_2 = -1.433V (Incorrect)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should start from integrating the Differential electric field strength that a point charge would exert at that point
 
Oerg said:
You should start from integrating the Differential electric field strength that a point charge would exert at that point
Field:
\lambda = \frac{q}{L} = \frac{q}{2 \pi r} = \frac{dq}{ds}
ds = r d\theta
dq = \lambda r d\theta
dE = \frac{cos\theta dq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}
E = \int_{\frac{-\phi}{2}}^{\frac{\phi}{2}}{\frac{\lambda cos\theta d\theta}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}} = \frac{\lambda(sin\frac{\phi}{2} - sin\frac{-\phi}{2})}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r} = \frac{qsin\frac{\phi}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2}

Potential:
E = \frac{dV}{dr}
V = \int{\frac{qsin\frac{\phi}{2}dr}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2}} = \frac{q sin\frac{\phi}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int{\frac{dr}{r^2}} = \frac{-q sin\frac{\phi}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r}

Values:
V_1 = \frac{-2.4*10^{-12} sin\frac{\pi/2}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = -0.076V
V_2 = \frac{6 * 2.4*10^{-12} sin\frac{3\pi/2}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = 0.455V
V_{net} = V_1 + V_2 = 0.379 V (Incorrect)
 
your expression for \lambda is wrong. the charge isn't distributed along the whole circle, but along a secion of 1/4 or 3/4 of the circle. The rest is OK.

The whole problem gets much simpler, if you see that V doesn't depend on where the charge is, but only on the distance. Since all the charges are at the same distance from the center, you can move them all to a single point at distance r from the cednter
 
kamerling said:
your expression for \lambda is wrong. the charge isn't distributed along the whole circle, but along a secion of 1/4 or 3/4 of the circle. The rest is OK.
Hadn't even considered that the density equation could be wrong - I figured the mistake was somewhere in the following page of calculus. Thanks for pointing that out, that must be why the answers are incorrect.

kamerling said:
The whole problem gets much simpler, if you see that V doesn't depend on where the charge is, but only on the distance. Since all the charges are at the same distance from the center, you can move them all to a single point at distance r from the cednter
Realized this and got the answer correct just prior to returning here to mark this thread solved. Thanks for your help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top