Voltage Regulators: Understanding Transistors Biasing at 11:35

kliker
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
hi i can't understand something in voltage regulators

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FJJre-HG_0&feature=channel

at 11:35 he starts explaning why Vb's equation is like that but i don't get it

at 12:00

he says that Vcc/(R1+R2) gives the current through the two resistors

but how is that possible? I mean in the circuit these two resistors don't have the same current because they are connected in parallel, so why does he say that they have the same current?

i can't get it, i would appreciate any explanation, this is the only thing that i can't understand from his lecture and i really need to understand it because i can't solve problems because of it

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R1 and R2 aren't connected in parallel. Why do you think they are?

He's using the approximation that the base current IB is very small, so you can neglect it. This means all the current flowing through R1 also goes through R2. In other words, R1 and R2 are effectively in series so you have a simple voltage divider.
 
vela said:
R1 and R2 aren't connected in parallel. Why do you think they are?

He's using the approximation that the base current IB is very small, so you can neglect it. This means all the current flowing through R1 also goes through R2. In other words, R1 and R2 are effectively in series so you have a simple voltage divider.

thanks a lot ;)

one more question, can we always assume that Ib is too small?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top