Volume integral over a gradient (quantum mechanics)

astrocytosis
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



1) Calculate the density of states for a free particle in a three dimensional box of linear size L.

2) Show that ##\int f \nabla g \, d^3 x=-\int g \nabla f \, d^3 x## provided that ##lim_{r \rightarrow \inf} [f(x)g(x)]=0##

3) Calculate the integral ##\int xe^{-i\mathbf{q \cdot x}} e^{-Zr/a_0} \, d^3 x##

Homework Equations



Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
(1) seems straightforward; I followed the method in Sakurai and got $$\frac{m^{3/2}L^3 \sqrt{E}}{\pi^2 \hbar^2 \sqrt{2}}. $$ (2) and (3) though I'm confused about the context. am I supposed to be thinking of some specific functions when it comes to f and g? the limit is in r but the functions are of x? am I missing some identities that would help me solve it?

(3) doesn't look difficult but the professor said the calculation would be quite involved, so I'm clearly not thinking about it correctly, and I'm not seeing how the result (2) would help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, I think all I need for (2) is the product rule since f*g is going to zero, but I'm still not sure how this relates to (3)
 
Hi astrocytosis,

I didn't check (1) so I can't really comment on that.

(2) To see this consider the follwoing. Let ##\bf v## be a vector field and ##u## a scalar field. Now one can prove that the following identity holds
$$
\mathop{\rm div}({\bf v}u)=
(\mathop{\rm div}{\bf v})\,u+
{\bf v}\cdot\mathop{\rm grad}u.
$$
Now let ##G## be a finite domain. We than have
$$
\int_{\partial G}{\bf v}\,u\;{\rm d}\boldsymbol\sigma
=\int_G\mathop{\rm div}({\bf v}u)\;{\rm d}^3y
=\int_G(\mathop{\rm div}{\bf v})\,u\;{\rm d}^3y+
\int_G{\bf v}\cdot\mathop{\rm grad}u\;{\rm d}^3y
$$
Now if we let ##G\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^3## and the limit you were given holds the integral over ##\partial G## vanishes and you get the desired identity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top