Water flow down a porous channel (Navier-Stokes/Fluid dynamics)

AI Thread Summary
Water flows down a porous channel where seepage occurs at a constant speed, significantly slower than the flow speed along the surface. The x-component of the Navier-Stokes equation is provided, and the general solution is verified, but the user struggles to eliminate integration constants and derive the required equation. Boundary conditions are established as u(0)=0 and u(H)=U, although the user is uncertain about their correctness. A key point is that the no-slip condition at the channel floor justifies u(0)=0, rather than the seepage rate. To fully solve the problem, an additional constraint is necessary to eliminate all constants.
tome101
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Water flows down a channel whose floor is porous, so that water seeps out of the bottom of the channel at a speed v, where v is constant and much less than the flow speed, U, along the surface of the channel. The seepage rate is slow so that H may be regarded as constant.

The x−component of the Navier-Stokes equation for such a system is

\nu\frac{d^{2}u}{dy^{2}}+v\frac{du}{dy}+G=0

where G is a constant.

Verify (i.e. no need to derive) that the general solution of this equation is

u=A-\frac{G}{v}y+Be^{-vy/\nu}

where A and B are integration constants.
State clearly what the boundary conditions are that determine A, B and G, and verify that the required solution is:

u*=\frac{1-Re^{-R}y*-e^{-Ry*}}{1-(R+1)e^{-R}}

where u = Uu*, y = Hy* and R = vH/\nu.

Homework Equations


u(0)=0

u(H)=U


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, I managed the first part and have verified that the 2nd equation is indeed a solution of the first. However, I am having trouble removing the integration constants and G and rearranging to the required equation.

I know that at the top of the channel, u=U so u(H)=U. I'm also assuming that since v is 'much less' than the flow speed we can assum that at the bottom of the path the horizontal flow speed is equivalent to 0 (although I am less sure about this).

So that gives boundary conditions of:
u(H)=0
u(0)=0

Using u(0)=0 I can see that A+B=0

I can get an equation for U by using u(H).

However, I can't seem to find any useful way of rearranging these equations to a) remove A B and G or b) look anything like the final equation... I am also not 100% certain my boundary conditions are corect. Attached is a diagam of the problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 490
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
290 views and no-one has any thoughts on this? I'm still completely stumped! I've also just noticed i should say u(H)=U under the attempted solution
 
Last edited:
I'm not very familiar with fluid dynamics at all, but here are some thoughts:

Since you have three constants to eliminate, you'll need three equations. Your boundary conditions only give you two. You need to get one more constraint from somewhere.

The condition u(0)=0 is correct — you can see this by setting y*=0 in the provided solution — but your reason for it is wrong. It doesn't have to do with the seepage rate. It's the no-slip condition. The water doesn't slide along the channel floor.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top