Wave Race 2: Explain the logic behind this formulary?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the velocities of transverse and longitudinal waves produced by an earthquake, specifically how to derive a formula relating to their travel times and distances. The context is set within a homework assignment where the original poster seeks clarification on the derivation of a specific formula presented by their teacher.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the distances traveled by the two types of waves and their respective velocities. There is an exploration of algebraic manipulation to derive the teacher's formula, with some participants attempting to guide others through the derivation process without providing complete solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively engaging in the derivation of the formula. Some guidance has been offered, and there is a collaborative effort to understand the logic behind the formula, although no consensus has been reached on the derivation process itself.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of understanding the derivation without the teacher's direct explanation, highlighting the importance of clarity in the problem setup and the assumptions involved in the calculations.

pugfug90
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=160610
Continuing off this problem..
My teacher wrote the solution on the board (and conveniently went to the hospital before our period).
Problem again..

Homework Statement


The velocity of the transverse waves produced by an earthquake is 8.9km/s while that of the longitudinal waves is 5.1km/s. A seismograph records the arrival of the transverse waves 73s before that of the longitudinal waves. How far away was the earthquakes?

The Attempt at a Solution


Doc Al's formula was.. the distance/displacement of transverse velocity is equal to the distance/displacement of longitudinal velocity * time + 73s..
Or..
d=vt=(8.9km/s)* T=(5.1km/s) * (T+73s)
And eventually, the T will get isolated..
================================
On the board..
His formula was
Timetransverse=[VlongitudinalΔt]/(vtransverse-Vlongitudinal)

Δt being 73s, the rest being self explanatory.

And it turns out.. seconds is also 98s! Seems like fiddling of numbers until eventually getting the right answer.. but nah:-p

And how in the world did he derive that formula.. Time of transverse wave is equal to the velocity of the longitudinal wave times the change in time divided by the difference in velocity. :bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both waves travel a distance of d.

This involves a little algebra. I'll start the derivation and let you finish it. (It's good practice!)

Consider the following and then see if you can finish what I start and derive his formula.

Transverse Wave:

[tex]d=V_Tt[/tex]

Longitudinal Wave:

[tex]d = V_L(t+ \Delta t)[/tex]

Since both waves travel the same distances, we can eliminate d from the problem as follows:

[tex]V_Tt = d = V_L(t+ \Delta t)[/tex]
[tex]V_Tt = V_L(t+ \Delta t)[/tex]

Now from here on you should be able to isolate t and solve for it. You should get your teachers formula. Good Luck! If you need any more help, don't hesitate to ask.

G01
 
Ahha..
So Vtransverset=Vlongitudinalt + VlongitudinalΔt

Then..

Vtransverset - Vlongitudinalt = VlongitudinalΔt

Then..

t(Vtransverse - Vlongitudinal) =VlongitudinalΔt

Then..

t=[VlongitudinalΔt]/(Vtransverse - Vlongitudinal)

Which is what teacher got. I thought he found some newer innovative way to derive that.. If he had showed how he derived the formula, it would've helped. Thanks:smile:
 
Nice Job. Its no problem. Glad I could help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K