Wavefunction obeying Schrodinger equation.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a problem involving the Schrödinger equation, specifically the equation - (ħ²/2m)∇²u + Vu = Eu. The user initially misapplied the equation and incorrectly differentiated the wavefunction, leading to an incorrect result. The correct approach involves using the product rule for differentiation on the wavefunction expressed as r * exp(-Zr/a). The conversation highlights the importance of accurate differentiation and understanding the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with differentiation techniques, particularly the product rule
  • Knowledge of wavefunctions and their physical significance
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics, including potential energy (V) and energy (E) terms
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of the product rule in calculus
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Schrödinger equation
  • Learn about wavefunction normalization and boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore advanced topics such as solving the Schrödinger equation for different potentials
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of wavefunctions and the Schrödinger equation.

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've attached my past paper question, which contains the relevant integral identity too.


The Attempt at a Solution



This question is relatively simple, yet I can't seem to complete it.

I used the Schrödinger equation which is:

-(ħ²/2m)\nabla^2u + Vu = Eu

I then used the identity given in the question, to differentiate the wavefunction w.r.t to r twice. (In this part I had to differentiate by products since there was another factor of r).

Differentiating the wavefunction twice gave me:

(Z²/a²).r.u

When I put this into the Schrödinger equation above, knowing V and E, I don't get the correct answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I forgot to say, that it's the first part of the question which I'm having trouble with.Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • QM question s.jpg
    QM question s.jpg
    41.7 KB · Views: 460
Can't tell you where you go wrong since you barely show any work, but I can tell you two things.

1) Your Schrödinger equation is incorrect.

2) You differentiated the wave function twice incorrectly.
 
I've fixed that now. I differentiated the wavefunction using the product rule:

using the identity given in the question, I had:

d²/dr²[ r. exp(-Zr/a)] Is this what I need to differentiate?
 
Out of interest, how would one go about solving the third part of this question?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K