Wavelength used in double slit experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of wavelengths in the double slit experiment, specifically addressing a discrepancy in the expected wavelength results. The initial calculations suggested a second wavelength of 566.4 nm, while the correct wavelength was identified as 495 nm. Participants noted potential errors in the problem setup and calculations, with one contributor suggesting a wavelength of 472 nm as the correct value. The conversation highlights the importance of precise calculations and the potential for errors in estimating wavelengths. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for careful verification in physics problems.
songoku
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
389
Homework Statement
In two separate double slit experiments, two different wavelengths are used. First wavelength is 708 nm and it is observed the second order bright fringe occurs at same position as third order dark fringe of second wavelength. Determine the second wavelength
Relevant Equations
Bright fringe: d sin theta = m.lambda

Dark fringe: d sin theta = (m - 1/2).lambda
m × lambda for bright = (m - 1/2) × lambda for dark so:
2 × 708 = 2.5 × second lambda
Second lambda = 566.4 nm

But the answer is 495 nm. Where is my mistake? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like they did it for 3rd order bright fringe. Did you copy the problem correctly? Looks like they may have made an error.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
I agree with your answer. You could round it to 566 nm, however, the original wavelength was not given with more digits either.

708/495 = 1.43 and 495/708 = 0.70 both don't look like plausible fractions and I don't find an easy typo that would lead to this answer.

@Charles Link: That would be 472 nm.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and Charles Link
@mfb has the 472 correctly computed. I should have multiplied it out, instead of estimating it. (495 is not correct for any choice).
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
Thank you very much for the help Charles Link and mfb
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top