Finding Weir Flow with Unknown Variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter sharp910sh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Variables
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the discharge coefficient (cd) for weir flow using the formula q = cd (2/3) b √(2g) h^(3/2). The experiment involved measuring the width and height of the weir while adding an unknown mass incrementally, leading to two unknown variables: the mass flow (x) and the discharge coefficient (cd). It was clarified that cd is not constant and varies based on the height of the flow, with specific values provided for rectangular and triangular weirs. The participant struggled to reconcile their results with the theoretical values due to incorrect measurements. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of weir flow calculations and the variability of discharge coefficients in practice.
sharp910sh
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ok i have a problem, i did a experiment to find the weir flow. Using q= cd 2/3 b root (2g) x h^(3/2)

I measured b the width of the weir and the height. i was asked to find out the discharge coefficient cd. what i did was add weight to an unknow mass. so the original mass mass flow was x then we added 2.5kg each time. so to find to the flow q i do x (unknow mass) /time. I know have two unknow variables x and cd, where cd isn't constant. so i can't equate two readings. is cd was constant then u could.

Homework Equations


q= cd 2/3 b root (2g) x h^(3/2)


The Attempt at a Solution



ive given up
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are not coefficients constants?
 
i got it now, the coefficients aren't constant. the coefficient for the rectanglular flow is cd=0.611 +h/z. so i can get the mass. and for the triangular weir cd is 0.58. but because my results are wrong. i can't sub these values into the equation to get the original flow, then the mass.
 
It's been a long time since I worked these kinds of problems. From my old text it mentions that (note K=cd):
Numerous values for K (or a similar coefficient) have been published in hydraulic liteature, and a rational analysis by von Mises indicated K to have the form
K=0.611 + 0.075 H/Z
Essentials of Engineering Fluid Mechanics by Reuben M. Olson
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
899
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top