What Applied Force is Needed to Push a Box Up a Ramp at 50 Degrees?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the applied force required to push a 10-kg box up a ramp at a 50-degree angle, referencing a table of forces at various angles. The formula used is applied force = mg sin(degree of angle), but there are discrepancies in the provided data, suggesting potential errors in the problem statement. The participant notes that their calculations do not match the table values, indicating possible frictional forces not accounted for. It is suggested that if friction were included, the coefficient of kinetic friction would need to vary, which contradicts the assumption of a constant coefficient. Overall, the data appears inconsistent, complicating the ability to accurately predict the force needed at 50 degrees.
bratleroni
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The table (below) shows the force needed to push a 10-kg box up a ramp as the angles increase. From the trend in the table, what is the applied force needed if the angle of the ramp increases to 50 degrees?

Applied Force (N) ; Ramp Angle (Degrees)
19N ; 10 degrees
30N ; 20 degrees
40N ; 30 degrees
49N ; 40 degrees

Homework Equations



applied force = mg sin(degree of angle)


The Attempt at a Solution



I honestly don't know about this, and I'm not really looking for the answer to the problem, just the "how-to". I tried, with the equation above, to see if it worked for the 19N ; 10 degrees (in the table). My work looked like:

applied force = (10kg)(9.81)sin(10) = 17.0348...

This obviously isn't the 19N that I was supposed to get. I can't find any decent explanations for this problem, and would appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, there could be friction acting, but something is wrong with the problem data. For example, when theta = 30 degrees, then you need at least 50 N to get it to move, but the table indicates 40 N.
 
PhanthomJay said:
Well, there could be friction acting, but something is wrong with the problem data.

Alright well, that was all the info I was given for the problem, so in that case I'm assuming my teacher transposed the numbers or something? Other than that, was I at least correct in what formula to use in that type of problem, and in the execution? Its just that I really don't know how to do this, and would at least like to know if I was going about it the right way, even if the data provided is wrong.
 
I agree, there seems to be something wrong with the problem statement.

If you are sure there is no friction then you have exactly the right setup and you know the data is off, but even if you try to account for friction the numbers given produce a coefficient of kinetic friction that is not constant.

With friction,

F_{push} = f_{k} + F_{g}Sin(\theta)

So that extra friction force can be set up to give you the 19 N. at 10 degrees, but then the rest of the data needs a different coefficient of friction to produce the stated forces. If the data were correct, the coefficient should stay constant and allow you to predict the force needed at 50 degrees.

That's all I got.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top