What are the unknowns in this nuclear reaction sequence?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the unknowns X and Y in a nuclear reaction sequence involving nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, and fluorine isotopes. Participants agree that Y is likely a positron (e+) to balance the equation, referencing Soddy's Law for protons and nucleons. There is uncertainty regarding X, with suggestions that it cannot be a gamma photon due to binding energy considerations. The conversation highlights the complexities of decay processes, particularly the electron capture of fluorine-17, which adds to the confusion about the reactions. Overall, the participants seek clarity on these nuclear reactions and the implications of energy balance.
AStaunton
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
Hi there

problem is:

given the following nuclear reaction sequence, determine X and Y:

_{9}^{15}N+_{1}^{1}H\rightarrow_{8}^{16}O+\gamma

_{8}^{16}O+_{1}^{1}H\rightarrow_{9}^{17}F+X

_{9}^{17}F\rightarrow_{8}^{17}O+Y+\nu_{e}

My Attempted answer is:

As far as I can see, Y must be a e^{+} in order to balance with the \nu_{e} in the equation. But I am in doubt about this as the above way I am think is beta+ emission, however I read that the way of decay of fluorine-17 is electron capture so I don't know how to reconcile this.

Regarding what X is, I am not sure...I do not think it can be a \gamma as binding energy per nucleon of oxygen 16 is greater than that of fluorine 17..I don't see how it can be a lepton as the lepton number seems to be balanced already...

Any feedback on my queries for X and Y is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AStaunton said:
Hi there

problem is:

given the following nuclear reaction sequence, determine X and Y:

_{9}^{15}N+_{1}^{1}H\rightarrow_{8}^{16}O+\gamma

_{8}^{16}O+_{1}^{1}H\rightarrow_{9}^{17}F+X

_{9}^{17}F\rightarrow_{8}^{17}O+Y+\nu_{e}

My Attempted answer is:

As far as I can see, Y must be a e^{+} in order to balance with the \nu_{e} in the equation. But I am in doubt about this as the above way I am think is beta+ emission, however I read that the way of decay of fluorine-17 is electron capture so I don't know how to reconcile this.

Regarding what X is, I am not sure...I do not think it can be a \gamma as binding energy per nucleon of oxygen 16 is greater than that of fluorine 17..I don't see how it can be a lepton as the lepton number seems to be balanced already...

Any feedback on my queries for X and Y is appreciated

Hi !

I agree with Y must be a e^(+) (positron).

Because with Soddy's Law you have: For protons: 9 = 8 + Y + 0 <=> Y = 1
And for nucleons you have: 17 = 17 + Y + 0 <=> Y = 0
It's a positron !

Try to use my method.

Good luck ! :D
 
AStaunton said:
Regarding what X is, I am not sure...I do not think it can be a \gamma as binding energy per nucleon of oxygen 16 is greater than that of fluorine 17..I don't see how it can be a lepton as the lepton number seems to be balanced already...
Extra energy can be supplied by kinetic energy, since the H impinges on the O.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top