What Determines the Charge of an Object in Electrostatic Induction?

AI Thread Summary
A body maintains a constant negative electrostatic charge by having the same excess of electrons. In a scenario involving electrostatic induction, a negatively charged rod A induces a positive charge on rod B, which then transfers this positive charge to object C upon contact. The confusion arises from the understanding that induction leads to a net positive charge on B, allowing it to attract electrons from C when they touch. The discussion clarifies that induction differs from conduction, as it alters the charge distribution without direct electron transfer until contact occurs. Ultimately, the charge on object C becomes positive because it is influenced by the net positive charge of rod B.
MIA6
Messages
231
Reaction score
0
1. A body will maintain a constant negative electrostatic charge if the body
1) Maintains the same excess of electrons. 3) Continuously receives more electrons than it loses.
I chose 3) but I think both choices work. However, the correct answer is 1), I don’t why 3) is wrong.

2. Negatively charged rod A is used to charge rod B by induction. Object C is then charged by direct contact with rod B. The charge on object C
1) is positive 3) is negative.
I chose 3) because when negative charged rod A moves close to one end of rod B, the electrons in rod B would gather at the other end, so left the opposite end all positive. After that, when C comes to contact with rod B, it depends on which end it touches. I am little confused. If it touches the negative end, then C becomes negative; vice versa. But the answer was 1).

thanks for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


MIA6 said:
1. A body will maintain a constant negative electrostatic charge if the body
1) Maintains the same excess of electrons. 3) Continuously receives more electrons than it loses.
I chose 3) but I think both choices work. However, the correct answer is 1), I don’t why 3) is wrong.

2. Negatively charged rod A is used to charge rod B by induction. Object C is then charged by direct contact with rod B. The charge on object C
1) is positive 3) is negative.
I chose 3) because when negative charged rod A moves close to one end of rod B, the electrons in rod B would gather at the other end, so left the opposite end all positive. After that, when C comes to contact with rod B, it depends on which end it touches. I am little confused. If it touches the negative end, then C becomes negative; vice versa. But the answer was 1).

thanks for help.


1. The operative word is Constant. Unchanging. Stays the same.

2. If B's charge is affected by induction, it will be net positive and then it will be a sink for electrons when it is touched by C, imparting a net positive to C as well.
 


LowlyPion said:
2. If B's charge is affected by induction, it will be net positive and then it will be a sink for electrons when it is touched by C, imparting a net positive to C as well.

But induction is not conduction, why B will be net positive? If B is positive orginally, it's still postive; if it's negative, it will still be negative.
 


MIA6 said:
But induction is not conduction, why B will be net positive? If B is positive orginally, it's still postive; if it's negative, it will still be negative.

A is negative. Induction makes B net positive. Touching neutral C to B makes C net positive too.
 


LowlyPion said:
A is negative. Induction makes B net positive. Touching neutral C to B makes C net positive too.

If B is net positive, where did some electrons in B go?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top