What Does 'a' Represent in a Non-Constant Charge Density Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the variable 'a' in the charge density equation ρ = az², where ρ represents volumetric charge density and z is the distance from the center of a charged plate. Participants clarify that 'a' is a constant specific to the situation, indicating that the charge density is not uniform, as it varies with distance. The conversation highlights the implications of this non-constant density on calculations, particularly in relation to Gauss's law, which typically assumes a constant charge density for simplicity. It is emphasized that when dealing with a variable charge density, one must consider this in calculations of electric flux through Gaussian surfaces. Overall, the complexity of the problem arises from the non-uniform nature of the charge density.
industry86
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
an "infinite" sheet with a thickness has a uniform density charge. however, my teacher gave it in rho=az^2. I know what rho is, and I know what z is. What is 'a'? He's used it in an example or two, but never thought to ask what it means and if it's consistent for all distances of the electric field and whatnot...
If I could just know this, then I think my life would be much easier and I think I could figure out this problem. I've looked online and throughout my book but I cannot find it's reference anywhere. I've found it one place in this forum, but it wasn't explained because it seemed everybody already knew.
Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. I don't recognize this particular formula. So, what is rho here? Is is volumetric charge density? Is "z" the position through the thickness? If this is the case then the fomula gives the charge density as a function of distance as you move through the thickness of the plate. Then "a" would be some constant particular to any given situation. And if this is so, then it is not a uniform charge density.
 
Chi Meson said:
Hmm. I don't recognize this particular formula. So, what is rho here? Is is volumetric charge density? Is "z" the position through the thickness? If this is the case then the fomula gives the charge density as a function of distance as you move through the thickness of the plate. Then "a" would be some constant particular to any given situation. And if this is so, then it is not a uniform charge density.

well, in the particular instance of the problem i have, rho is in reference to volumetric charge density, z is the distance from the center of the plate. i have seen it used in either a radius or linear capacity. and I know it's dimensionally C/m^? since I've seen the m with powers of 4 or 5. So I'm at a loss.
 
Hmm, seems like we have a little issue here. If the volume density is really what's given, the it sure isn't constnat, not one bit. This question Is nothing more than an extension of gauses law. When calculating the flux through a gaissian surface, most of the time the density is constant, and thus makes the calculation of the Qnet much easier. But if the density is a function of the distance, then that's got to be taken into consideration, as is the case for this problem. Recall that the flux through a gaussian surface is the CLOSED integral of E dA cos(theita)= Qenclosed/epsilon. Assuming your given a thickness z, you can create your gaussian surface and your limits of integration. AS far as I know, that seems to be the only way to solve this puppy, algebra just won't do. Give it a shot and see wha you can do with it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top