What is the Angle of Refraction for Electrons in a Metal Surface?

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



When an electron beam is incident on a metal surface at an angle tetha 1 to the normal, electron waves are refracted into the metal at an angle tetha 2, following Snell's law. The effect on an electron can be represented approximately by a drop in its potential energy.

For a particular metal surface, the size of this drop is 1.9E-18 J. If the energy of the incident electron beam is 1.6E-18 J, and its angle of incidence on the surface is 45 degrees, calculate the wavelengths of the electron waves inside and outside the metal and hence the angle of refraction of the electrons in the metal.

2. The attempt at a solution

E = 1.6E-18 = hf1 --> f1 = 2.42E15 Hz.

E = (1/2)mv1^2 = hf1 --> v = 1.87E6 m/s

lambda 1 = 1.87E6/2.41E15 = 7.8E-10 m

If the energy drop is bigger than the initial energy, the energy in the metal will be negative, and hence the frequency will be negative (impossible!), and I won't be able to calculate lambda 2. What is wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the energy drop refers to potential energy. Perhaps classical conservation-of-energy methods can be used.
 
"If the energy drop is bigger than the initial energy, the energy in the metal will be negative, and hence the frequency will be negative (impossible!),..."
I agree. Are you sure the incident energy is 1.6E-18 J?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top