What is the difference between proton-electron collison adn electron capture?

AI Thread Summary
Proton-electron collision and electron capture are distinct processes in particle physics. Proton-electron collision involves free electrons interacting with free protons, while electron capture refers to a nucleus capturing one of its own electrons. The difference lies in the conditions and interactions governed by weak forces; lowering the weak interaction force allows more electrons to bypass capture while increasing the likelihood of collisions with the nucleus. The type of W Boson emitted during these interactions also differentiates the two processes. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for studying weak interactions in atomic and subatomic physics.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Is it the same thing? If not what is the key difference between the two and what conditions would make the weak interactions governing the two more favourable than the other one?,

(My thoughts are along the lines of , that proton-electron collision is referring to free electrons or free protons , whereas electron capture speaks only in terms of an aom capturing it's own electron .
Another thought - the difference names refer to the type of W Boson emitted and by which particle - and are only there for this reason? )

I have tried googling this but could not find anything :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Electron capture means, a nucleus trapping or binding an electron flying by and making the electron circulate around the nucleus. Proton electron collision is pretty self explanatory - electron hitting a proton which in most cases means hitting a nucleus.

If you lower the weak interaction force, more and more electrons start flying by without getting captured by the nucleus. However, while doing this, more and more electrons will start to hit the nucleus when there's lower force preventing them from doing that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top