What is the difference in toxicity between thimerosal and straight mercury?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aquitaine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mercury Organic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between thimerosal and elemental mercury, highlighting their varying levels of toxicity. Thimerosal, an ethyl mercury compound, is less harmful than free metallic mercury due to its organic nature, which binds the mercury atom and reduces its poisonous effects. While thimerosal is not recommended for young children and has some toxic effects, its risk is lower compared to chronic exposure to methyl mercury. The toxicity of elemental mercury depends on the exposure route; inhalation poses a greater risk than ingestion or handling due to the absorption of mercury vapors. Overall, organo-mercury compounds like thimerosal are more soluble and readily absorbed, making them potentially more dangerous than elemental mercury in certain contexts.
aquitaine
Messages
30
Reaction score
9
So what is the difference between thimerosal and straight mercury? Is it more or less harmful?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Thimerosal is an organic compound and so it will hold to it's Hg atom somewhat. Hg as a free metal is a poison as it catalyzes some unwanted reactions or it simply stops some important ones. If the Hg atom is already bound then it's less poisonous or has a very small chance to be poisonous.

Just like cyanide. In our cells there are many compounds that hold onto the -CN bond.

Thimerosal is not suitable for little children so there are some poisonous effects, and from what I've read it' mainly used externally.
 
Cool, thanks.
 
Thimerosal is an ethyl mercury compound with a salicylate group attached. The compound http://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/071130_Geier_etal_PublishedReviewOfThimerosalPaper1.pdf" , a well-known mercury toxin. That said, the likelihood of thimerosal causing excessive toxicity is low since it is not something that one is chronically exposed to as opposed to methyl mercury, for example.

"Straight mercury" is not sufficiently descriptive to compare with thimerosal. If you are referring to elemental, metallic mercury, the answer is it depends on the route of exposure. If the mercury is inhaled over a period of time (as you might get in a closed room or lab that has had a mercury spill) the toxicity is certainly greater for elemental mercury in that case. If you ingest it or handle it, it has a much lower toxicity. http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/factsheets/mercuryhlthprof.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lok said:
Hg as a free metal is a poison as it catalyzes some unwanted reactions or it simply stops some important ones. If the Hg atom is already bound then it's less poisonous or has a very small chance to be poisonous.
In general it's the other way around.
Elemental liquid mercury is insoluble and although toxic it is difficult to absorb a serious dose - heated mercury vapour is more easily absorbed and so more dangerous.
Organo-mercury compounds are often a lot more soluble and much more readily absorbed - hence much more dangerous.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top