What is the Electric Field Magnitude at a Charged Ball's Position?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field magnitude at the position of a charged plastic ball due to a nearby charged glass rod. The ball, charged at -5.13 microCoulombs, experiences a horizontal electric force of 0.6672 milliNewtons. The user initially applied the formula E = F/Qo but faced challenges with unit conversions and the relevance of given parameters like the ball's radius and distance to the rod. Ultimately, they confirmed the formula's application was correct and resolved their stress regarding the lab quiz. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in physics problem-solving and the importance of unit consistency.
Zypheron
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having a problem with one of my physics problems.

A plastic ball of radius 5 cm is hanging from a string 2m away from a charged glass rod. The ball has been charged to -5.13 microCoulombs. If the electric force on the ball is 0.6672 milliNewtons in the horizontal direction, what is the magnitude of the electric field at the balls position?

I've worked at it by using E = F/Qo, but it just doesn't seem to be working out ><. I'm not looking for an answer, I'm looking to see if i am going about this problem in the right way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I presume this is part of a more extensive problem because, the way the problem is phrased, neither the radius of the ball nor the distance to the glass rod is relevant.
Yes, E= F/Q0= 0.6672 milliNewtons/(-5.13 microCoulombs). If that's not the correct answer, check to see if you need to convert units.
 
Yeah, those tricksy tricksy physics professors like to give the useless info. I ended up getting it right in the end and such (stupid lab quiz required that i use a direction, although it was implied by the positive and negative x-axis ><. Thanks for the help though. I was getting really really stressed out about it (needed to get that one so i could go to my lab today)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top