What is the electric potential at the center of a ring of charge?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential at the center of a ring of charge, specifically a plastic rod bent into a circle with a positive and negative charge distribution. Initial calculations for the potentials from each charge segment yielded incorrect results due to misapplication of the charge density formula. Participants highlighted that the electric potential does not depend on the specific distribution of charge along the circumference, as all charges are equidistant from the center. After correcting the charge density and integrating properly, the correct potential was determined. The thread concludes with acknowledgment of the solution and appreciation for the assistance received.
Necraz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Voltage from Ring of Charge

Homework Statement


A plastic rod has been bent into a circle of radius R = 6.40 cm. It has a charge Q1 = +2.40 pC uniformly distributed along one-quarter of its circumference and a charge Q2 = -6Q1 uniformly distributed along the rest of the circumference (Figure 24-39). Take V = 0 at infinity. What is the electric potential at the center C of the circle?


Homework Equations


dV = \frac{dq}{4\pi\epsilon_0r}
\lambda = \frac{q}{L}


The Attempt at a Solution


dq = \lambda r d \theta
\lambda = \frac{q}{2 \pi r}
V = \int_{0}^{\phi}{\frac{\lambda d \theta}{4\pi\epsilon_0}} = \frac{\lambda \phi}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} = \frac{q \phi}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r}
V_1 = \frac{(2.4*10^-12)(\pi / 2)}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = 0.0843V
V_2 = \frac{-6(2.4*10^-12)(3\pi / 2)}{8 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = -1.517V
V_{net} = V_1 + V_2 = -1.433V (Incorrect)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should start from integrating the Differential electric field strength that a point charge would exert at that point
 
Oerg said:
You should start from integrating the Differential electric field strength that a point charge would exert at that point
Field:
\lambda = \frac{q}{L} = \frac{q}{2 \pi r} = \frac{dq}{ds}
ds = r d\theta
dq = \lambda r d\theta
dE = \frac{cos\theta dq}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}
E = \int_{\frac{-\phi}{2}}^{\frac{\phi}{2}}{\frac{\lambda cos\theta d\theta}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r}} = \frac{\lambda(sin\frac{\phi}{2} - sin\frac{-\phi}{2})}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r} = \frac{qsin\frac{\phi}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2}

Potential:
E = \frac{dV}{dr}
V = \int{\frac{qsin\frac{\phi}{2}dr}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r^2}} = \frac{q sin\frac{\phi}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int{\frac{dr}{r^2}} = \frac{-q sin\frac{\phi}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 r}

Values:
V_1 = \frac{-2.4*10^{-12} sin\frac{\pi/2}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = -0.076V
V_2 = \frac{6 * 2.4*10^{-12} sin\frac{3\pi/2}{2}}{4 \pi^2 \epsilon_0 (0.064)} = 0.455V
V_{net} = V_1 + V_2 = 0.379 V (Incorrect)
 
your expression for \lambda is wrong. the charge isn't distributed along the whole circle, but along a secion of 1/4 or 3/4 of the circle. The rest is OK.

The whole problem gets much simpler, if you see that V doesn't depend on where the charge is, but only on the distance. Since all the charges are at the same distance from the center, you can move them all to a single point at distance r from the cednter
 
kamerling said:
your expression for \lambda is wrong. the charge isn't distributed along the whole circle, but along a secion of 1/4 or 3/4 of the circle. The rest is OK.
Hadn't even considered that the density equation could be wrong - I figured the mistake was somewhere in the following page of calculus. Thanks for pointing that out, that must be why the answers are incorrect.

kamerling said:
The whole problem gets much simpler, if you see that V doesn't depend on where the charge is, but only on the distance. Since all the charges are at the same distance from the center, you can move them all to a single point at distance r from the cednter
Realized this and got the answer correct just prior to returning here to mark this thread solved. Thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top