What is the Electric Potential of a Uniformly Charged Bent Wire?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential of a uniformly charged bent wire with a linear charge density of λ=6.22×10-9 C/m. The user attempts to set up integrals for different segments of the wire, including a line and a circular arc, using the formula V = k integral (dq/r). There is confusion regarding the integration limits and the interpretation of 'r' as the distance from the charge to the origin, which cannot be negative. Suggestions are provided for simplifying logarithmic terms and using LaTex for better forum formatting. The user seeks clarification on how to express the left side integral in relation to the origin.
Leeoku
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


. A wire of finite length that has a uniform linear charge density
λ=6.22×10-9 C/m is bent into the shape shown below.
[PLAIN]http://lulzimg.com/i23/7498af.jpg
Answer: 2.98e+02 V

Homework Equations


V = k integral (dq/r)

The Attempt at a Solution


So i think my integrals are right not sure. I have to split into line and circle.
Left line: K (integral -3r->-R) lambda dx/x
Circle: K (integral -pi->0) lambda d theta
Right line k(Integral R->3R) lambda dx/x

So when i integrate and plug stuff in i get
K*Lambda (ln[-R]-ln[-3r]+pi+ln[3R]-ln[R])
im not sure how to simplify the terms with ln R

side note: How can i properly write stuff out on forums? =S
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Leeoku said:
So i think my integrals are right not sure. I have to split into line and circle.
Left line: K (integral -3r->-R) lambda dx/x

This isn't right. In V = k integral (dq/r), r is the distance between the charge and the origin, and can't be negative.

Circle: K (integral -pi->0) lambda d theta
Right line k(Integral R->3R) lambda dx/x

These are right.

So when i integrate and plug stuff in i get
K*Lambda (ln[-R]-ln[-3r]+pi+ln[3R]-ln[R])
im not sure how to simplify the terms with ln R

You can use the identity ln(a)+ln(b)=ln(a*b), or equivalently, ln(a)-ln(b)=ln(a/b).
side note: How can i properly write stuff out on forums? =S

The usual way is to use LaTex. See here for a tutorial: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwilkins/LaTeXPrimer/

For most purposes, you can just search up and use Unicode symbols along with the exponent and underscore tags. There are text symbols for all the Greek characters, for some fractions, for the integral sign, and probably for a lot more things I don't know about.
 
i don't understand what to integrate from the left side. How am i supposed to express it with relation to the origin or do i just take the right integral and multiply by 2?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top