What Is the Final Velocity of a Mass Accelerated by a Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisafeary
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biomechanics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the final velocity of a 9.4 kg mass initially moving at 3.7 m/s under a 36.5 N force for 1.32 seconds, the correct approach is to first determine acceleration using the formula a = F/m, resulting in an acceleration of 3.88 m/s². Applying this acceleration to find the final velocity, the equation vf = vi + a*t yields a final velocity of 8.72 m/s. The initial confusion stemmed from incorrectly calculating acceleration and not incorporating the force and mass correctly. The discussion highlights the importance of using proper formulas and units in physics problems. Accurate calculations lead to a clearer understanding of motion dynamics.
lisafeary
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
urgent help for biomechanics question

the question that I am not sure of is:
A body of mass 9.4 kg initially moving in a straight line at 3.7 m/s is acted on by an accelerating force of 36.5 N (in the same direction as initial motion) for 1.32 seconds Calculate the velocity of the body at the moment the applied force ceases. Express the units in symbol form in the space provided.

when i sorted it out i found acceleration first a=0-3.7/1.32= -2.80
then i had to find final
vf= 3.7+-2.80 x 1.32= my calculator came with 4.e-03 which is 0.004, however i did it another way and made acceleration positive and got 7.40.
but the one thing that I am concerned is that i have not inputed the Newtons and kilos in this equation :(
your help is greatly appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That's not the acceleration. The acceleration due to a force F is a = F/m.
 


so if i use that formula i did 36.5/9.4= 3.88 then used that to find final
vf= 3.7+ 3.88x1.32= 8.72m/s

it was sort of getting to me because there was a similar question but it did not give us the force in N but it gave the mass, time, final velocity, with that i found acceleration with using vf-vi/time and then times it by the mass. but seeing how you expressed the formula and how i see it varying with the other question makes sence
thanks heaps :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top