What is the Formula for Calculating Heat Exchange in a Boiler Flue?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating heat exchange in a boiler flue connected to two 150 HP boilers, with a focus on a heat exchanger made of 304 stainless steel. The flue gas temperature exceeds 300 F, and the user aims to achieve a 10 F temperature difference with a flow rate of 15 GPM, targeting a heat pickup of 250,000 BTUH. The current setup includes a 1" tube with fins, but there is consideration to increase the pipe size to 2" for a higher flow rate of 40 GPM. The user seeks assistance with the Q= U*A*LMTD calculations necessary for this configuration. Additional information or insights from others in the forum would be beneficial for resolving the heat exchange challenge.
Liljob
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a heat exchanger for a boiler flue. The flue is connected to two big (150 HP) boilers. A boiler HP = 33,000 BTUH. The are less than 80% efficient.

The heat exchanger problem is this:

The Flue contains gas temps above 300 F. The CFM is problematic but apparently the actual CFM could be increased by a factor of 4 or more due to the oxygen and moisture content of the flue gases. In any case the ambient temp in the flue is a near 300 F when the boiler(s) are operating.

The heat exchanger is made of 304 Stainless. It's a 1" tube with 7 fins per inch and the fins are .5" high. The length of the tubing is 360" and it is configured in a coil 30" in diameter. There are 95 square feet of surface area on the heat exchanger due to the fins.

The design entering water into the tube is 80 F and leaving 90 F.

So I have a 300 F heat source (steady) and I want a 10 F dT with a flow rate of 15 GPM. ( I can't get much more flow into a 1" pipe.)

I want to pick up 250,000 BTUH from this configuration and I am not adept at the Q= U*A*LMTD calcs to put this together.

Further, if it makes sense to do so, I would like to increase the Pipe size to 2" and put 40 GPM through this.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Thanks, Greg,

Let me revisit this and I'll get back to you.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top