What is the Maximum Electric Field of a Ring?

Stang289GT
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine both the location and the maximum magnitude Emax of the electric field along the axis of a uniformly charged ring. (Use epsilon_0 for ε0, Q, and a as necessary.)

Homework Equations


1) dE= (ke)dq/r^2cos(theta)
cos(theta)= x/r

2) Ex=Q*((ke*(x))/(a^2 + x^2)^3/2)
(a is the radius of the ring)


The Attempt at a Solution



I took the derivative of Equation 2 and set it equal to 0 to find the maximum x value
x=(a*sqrt(2))/2 and I know that to be the correct answer for where the maximum E occurs; but upon attempting to plug this back into the original equation to find what the maximum E would be, I get the wrong answer every time. Any advice as to what I'm doing wrong?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Stang289GT. Welcome to PF.

If you do not show what you have done, I cannot figure out where you went wrong. Also, please note that sometimes when you write something up for someone else to see, you find your own mistakes.
 
Hmmm...okay.
(there's a figure that goes along with this, but I can't upload it...)

Plugging in the maximum x=(a*sqrt(2))/2 value into equation 2 you get:

Emax=(k_e*Q*((a*sqrt(2))/2))/(((a*sqrt(2))/2)^2 + a^2)^(3/2)
simplifying this, I think it's supposed to be:
Emax=(k_e*Q*sqrt(2))/6a
but this answer is not correct. Is there an equation other than this one that I should be using?
 
Assuming that your expression for the E-field is correct, your problem is probably in your simplification. It would help if you wrote

\frac{a \sqrt{2}}{2}=\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}

then the denominator becomes

(\frac{a^{2}}{2}+a^{2})^{3/2}=(\frac{3 a^{2}}{2})^{3/2}

and simplify from there.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top