What Is the Maximum Slit Width in a Double Slit Experiment?

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



6ejblx.png


Estimate maximum slit width of a double slit.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Letting the slit width be a,

The intensity profile of such a system is:

I = I_0 sinc^2\left( \frac{Nkasin \theta}{2} \right) cos^2\left( \frac{kd sin\theta}{2} \right)

I suppose the maximum slit width is when a = d? Such that all the interference maxima coincides with the minima from diffraction envelope. But physically this would mean that both slits collapse into one..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is not about the width of the double slits. - It is about the width of the source slit (that's where the light comes from to begin with even before reaching the double slits.
 
dauto said:
The question is not about the width of the double slits. - It is about the width of the source slit (that's where the light comes from to begin with even before reaching the double slits.

Hmm, that's interesting. But the first thought is that why would it matter? If the beam is really wide, it would get diffracted the normal way.
 
It matters because it determines whether or not the incoming light is coherent.
 
dauto said:
It matters because it determines whether or not the incoming light is coherent.

Well, but there is no path difference before approaching the slit, so why would it matter?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top