What is the minimum force required to keep two cables taut at a given point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fociboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Range
AI Thread Summary
To keep two cables taut at a point, the force P must be greater than zero to ensure the horizontal component of tension is maintained. If P is too small, the weight will pull the connection point A toward the wall, while if P is too large, it will pull A upward. The discussion emphasizes resolving forces into x and y components to determine the conditions under which the tension in the cables remains positive. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing the system effectively. Engaging in such discussions can enhance knowledge and problem-solving skills in physics.
fociboy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The cables are tied at A and loaed as shown
Determine the range of values of P for which both cables remain taut !
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/27fcfeba9a.jpg

I have an idea on the AC rope. Since the tension force T must not be zero on the horizontal line (or the line along AC), therefore, the min force of P > 0. Because when P>0, the horizontal component is not zero. Is it true? How about AB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi fociboy ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

If P is too small, the 960N weight will pull A toward the wall.

If P is too large, it will pull A upward.

Hint: the question is really asking you find the formulas for the tension in each cable.

Then you choose the values for which the tension in either cable is zero. :smile:
 
Dear tiny-tim,
I've known how to solve it. We resolve all the force into x and y component. And determine the conditions that the tension force on the rope is more than zero
 
Hi fociboy! :smile:
fociboy said:
Dear tiny-tim,
I've known how to solve it. We resolve all the force into x and y component. And determine the conditions that the tension force on the rope is more than zero

(you mean I know how to solve it, or I've found how to solve it :wink:)

That's right … resolve into components. :smile:

Is everything ok now?
 
I see. But you know, I've started studying in university and there're still a lot of things to know. I hope I can join and become an active member of the forum. Thanks :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top