What Is the Net Force on the -2 mC Charge in a Triangular Charge Configuration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force on a -2 mC charge within a triangular configuration of three fixed charges. The initial calculations included incorrect angle assumptions, particularly regarding the angle at point 3, which was mistakenly identified as 32.5 degrees. A suggestion was made to accurately determine the angle using the arctangent function based on the coordinates of the charges. Additionally, it was pointed out that the angles between different charge pairs are not necessarily the same, which could lead to further errors in calculations. Accurate drawing and analysis of the charge configuration are recommended for clarity and correctness.
yjk91
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a region of two-dimensional space, there are three fixed charges: +1 mC at (0, 0), −2 mC at (15 mm, -2 mm), and +3 mC at (-5 mm, 15 mm). What is the net force on the −2-mC charge?


? magnitude
? direction ° counter-clockwise from the +x-axis



The Attempt at a Solution


3mc = point 1
1 mc = point 2
-2 mc = point 3

length (1-3) = 26.25 mm
length (2-3) = 15.133 mm
length(1-2) = 15.811 mm

angle at point 3 is 32.5 degree using the sss triangle formula

F(1to3) = k *q1* q3 / l^2
Fx13 = F(1to3) Cos(32.5)
Fy13 = F(1to3) sin(32.5)

F(2 to 3) = k *q2* q3 / l^2
Fx23 = F(2to3) Cos(32.5)
Fy23 = F(2to3) sin(32.5)

Fx13 + Fx23 = Fxnet
Fy13 + Fy23 = Fynet

rad (Fxnet ^2 + Fynet^2 ) = Fnet which is the magnitude but it seems like I'm off by few points the answer has to be pretty close since i have to plug it into the system. Does anyone know where i made the mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yjk91 said:
angle at point 3 is 32.5 degree using the sss triangle formula

It's not 32.5 degrees. Point 3 is at (15,-2), which means it's at an angle of atan(-2/15). Try drawing out the three points to get a better feel for the configuration.

F(2 to 3) = k *q2* q3 / l^2
Fx23 = F(2to3) Cos(32.5)
Fy23 = F(2to3) sin(32.5)

You seem to be assuming that the angle from 2 to 3 is the same as the angle from 1 to 3, but there's no reason for this to be the case.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top