What is the predicted mass of the Coma cluster using a simple model?

rohanlol7
Messages
66
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


An estimate of the mass of the Coma cluster can be made from the velocity of the galaxies relative to the centre of mass of the cluster; the velocities are around 2000 km s-1. The stars that form the cluster have been together for a long time. Show that a simple model will predict a mass of the cluster of the order of 2*10^43kg. The radius of the Coma cluster is about 10^21m.

Homework Equations


GMm/R^2 =Mv^2/R

The Attempt at a Solution


Tried a few things. First i tried to consider that as a spherical hollow shell. I calculated by using the above equation ( just plugin in values ) and i was off by a factor of 3. Next i tried to consider 2000 as being the AVERAGE speed. This time i was wrong by a factor of about 10.
I tried to model it as a disk but that seemed to complex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wikipedia says the Coma cluster has est. ##10^{14} - 10^{15}## sun masses, i.e. ##\; 2\cdot 10^{44}-2\cdot 10^{45}\,kg##.
Isn't this your factor ##10##?
 
fresh_42 said:
Wikipedia says the Coma cluster has est. ##10^{14} - 10^{15}## sun masses, i.e. ##\; 2\cdot 10^{44}-2\cdot 10^{45}\,kg##.
Isn't this your factor ##10##?
Maybe but the problem wants me to obtain 2*10^43
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top