What Is the Probability of Finding the Perturbed Oscillator in Its Ground State?

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I showed earlier this semester that in the presence of a "constant force", F_{o}, i.e. V=-Fx, that the eigenvalues for the Harmonic oscillator are shifted by

\frac{F^{2}}{2m\omega^{2}}

from the "unperturbed" case. It was also discussed that x\rightarrow x-\frac{F}{m\omega^{2}}.

An oscillator is initially in its ground state (n=0). At t=0, a perturbation V is suddenly applied. What is the probability of finding the system in its (new) ground state for t>0, i.e. find |a_{o}|^{2}.


Homework Equations


For this |a_{n}|^{2}=|\int \Phi^{*}_{n}(x)\Psi_{o}(x)dx|^{2} over all space.

The Attempt at a Solution



For t>0, the state of the system is \Psi(x,t)=\sum a_{n}exp(-i(\frac{E_{n}}{\hbar})t)\Phi_{n}(x). Here \Phi_{n}(x) is an eigenvector of H. And the coefficients a_{n} are obtained by expanding \Psi_{o}(x), the ground state of H_{o}, in terms of \Phi_{n}(x).

I also know that the basis states \Phi_{n}(x) as well as \Psi_{o}(x) are Hermite polynomials.

With that in mind my assumption would simply be to integrate the following:

|a_{o}|^{2}=|\int \Phi_{o}(x) \Psi_{o}(x) dx|^{2} =|\int 1*1 dx|^{2}

If I integrate this over all space I end up with a probability that goes to infinity. . . .Maybe I am missing something as far as Hermite polynomials go. . . or maybe I have the wrong idea about this problem. Any suggestions would be helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi matumich, sorry I'm not sure if I can help but if you could so kindly explain to me where you got the relavant equation for |a_n|^2 and for psi(x,t) I would greatly appreciate it. Also, could you explain to me why the last line is equal to |integral 1*1 dx|^2?
 
Hi matumich, sorry I'm not sure if I can help but if you could so kindly explain to me where you got the relavant equation for |a_n|^2 and for psi(x,t)
.

Well I made several mistakes. The equation |a_{n}|^{2}=|∫Φ^{∗}_{n}(x)Ψ_{o}(x)dx|^{2} was given in class. The coefficients a_{n} are obtained by expanding Ψ_{o}(x), the ground state of H_{o}, in terms of Φ_{n}(x). From this it follows that the probability of finding the system in some state (t>0) is given by that integral.


I would greatly appreciate it. Also, could you explain to me why the last line is equal to |integral 1*1 dx|^2?

This was just purely as mistake and since the eigenfunctions Φ_{n}(x) correspond to the state once the perturbation is applied they can be expanded in terms of their basis elements, which in this case are the Hermite polynomials. Similarly, the unperturbed wave function Ψ_{o}(x) can be expressed in terms of the Hermite polynomials. Therefore we have:

Φ_{n}(x) = C exp(-\frac{1}{2}\alpha^{2}(x-\frac{F}{m \omega^{2})^{2})H_{n}(x)

&

Ψ_{o}(x) = Cexp(-\frac{1}{2}\alpha^{2} x^{2})H_{o}(x) = exp(-\frac{1}{2}\alpha^{2} x^{2})

The probability would be along the lines of

|a_{o}|^{2}=|∫C exp(-\frac{1}{2}\alpha^{2}(x-\frac{F}{m \omega^{2})^{2})exp(-\frac{1}{2}\alpha^{2} x^{2})dx|^{2}

After normalizing both wave functions you can integrate this and find the appropriate probability of finding the system in the ground state for t>0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top