What is the ratio of radii for the two species X+ and X2+?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the ratio of the radii (r1/r2) for the singly ionized species X+ and the doubly ionized species X2+. Both species are subjected to the same electric potential and magnetic field, leading to circular motion. The charge of X2+ is twice that of X+, which affects their velocities due to differences in acceleration. After analyzing the equations for the radii, it becomes clear that the ratio is influenced by the charge and resulting velocities, leading to confusion about whether the ratio is 2 or the square root of 2. Ultimately, the correct interpretation involves recognizing that the velocity of X2+ is proportional to its charge, clarifying the ratio as square root of 2.
KatieD
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The ion source is a spectrometer produces both singly and doubly ionized species, X+ and X2+. The difference in mass between these species is too small to be detected. Both species are accelerated through the same electric potential difference, and both experience the same magnetic field, which causes them to move on circular paths. The radius of the path for the species X+ is r1 while the radius for species X2+ is r2. Find the ratio r1/r2 of the radii.

So this means:
m1=m2
V1=V2
B1=B2


Homework Equations


r=mv/qV


The Attempt at a Solution


We know that the charge of the X2+ is twice the X. I am just so confused about where to go from here. My teacher has written out the solution but it still makes no sense.

Please help :(

Katie
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You just about have it with your equation don't you?

Consider the equation for each particle.

Now take the ratio of the equations.

If the masses are virtually identical, the acceleration through the electrical potential and hence the velocities are also the same then aren't they?

By the time you get through canceling things out it looks to me like you can determine r1/r2 by inspection.
 
so here's where i am at:

r1=mv/qB
r2=mv/2qB

I then divide r1 and r2 getting
((m1v1)/(qB))/((m2v2)/(2qB))

then with canceling out I get r1/r2=2

I am confused, the teachers notes say its the square root of 2, I am not sure where this comes in
 
KatieD said:
so here's where i am at:

r1=mv/qB
r2=mv/2qB

I then divide r1 and r2 getting
((m1v1)/(qB))/((m2v2)/(2qB))

then with canceling out I get r1/r2=2

I am confused, the teachers notes say its the square root of 2, I am not sure where this comes in

Oops. Sorry. The acceleration through the electrical potential will result in a velocity that is not identical. It will be different how?
 
EPE= Vq
so if the force goes up... and the mass is the same the acceleration will have to go up with the second one by 2 right?
 
KatieD said:
EPE= Vq
so if the force goes up... and the mass is the same the acceleration will have to go up with the second one by 2 right?

I think they want you to accelerate that from rest. So ...

W = q*ΔV = 1/2*m*v2

Which means that the ratio of v2 = 2:1, since v2 is proportional to the charge.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top