What is the significance of 0.2% in determining proof load?

AI Thread Summary
Proof load refers to a predetermined load applied to a specimen to assess its ability to withstand service loads, while proof stress indicates the stress that causes a specified small permanent set in a material. The 0.2% offset is commonly used to determine yield strength because it simplifies the measurement process and avoids difficulties in identifying the elastic limit, especially for materials without a clear yield point. This offset method involves drawing a parallel line to the initial linear portion of the stress-strain curve, allowing for a practical approximation of the yield point. Alternatives like 0.1% and 0.5% offsets exist, but 0.2% strikes a balance between accuracy and ease of measurement. Understanding these concepts is essential for evaluating the mechanical properties of steel and other materials.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
I got a material property data for a steel as follows.

1.0.2% of proof load 358kg

2.0.2% of proof stress 28.64(kg/sqmm)


My questions are

1)what is proof load

2)what is 0.2% of proof load. Why 0.2%? Why not 0.3%

3)How this proof load is arrived while testing the specimin in a universal tensile testing machine?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Proof load is usually another term for the load associated with they yield point. Since it is a steel, it is customary to establish the elastic portion of the stress-strain curve and thus the yield point at a .2% offset. It is my understanding that .2% was agreed upon to use as the offset because not all materials have a distinct yield point.

Take a look here (scroll down to measures of yielding): http://www.key-to-steel.com/Articles/Art43.htm
 
Fred nailed this one right on!

If one checks a glossary in a reference book, one will find -
proof load
A predetermined load, generally some multiple of the service load, to which a specimen or structure is submitted before acceptance for use.

However,
proof stress
(1) A specified stress to be applied to a member or structure to indicate its ability to withstand service loads. (2) The stress that will cause a specified small permanent set in a material.

And it is the second definition which applies here.

IIRC, 0.1% strain offset has also been used in addition to the 0.2% offset, in the US. According to ASM's "Atlas of Stress-Strain Curves", in the UK (and perhaps outside of North America), offset yield strength is referred to as proof stress, and 0.1% or 0.5% is used.

The point of choosing 0.2% is that it is easier that 0.1% and not as much as 0.5%. Using the offset "avoids the practical difficulties of measuring the elastic or proportional limit" of a material. This is not so much a problem these days with digitally controlled tensile test systems, but it was significant 25 or more years ago before high quality digital electronics were available.

The idea was to get as close as reasonably possible to the elastic limit.
 
Well, when one a material doesn't has an obvious fluency point, and it has great unit strains after it has exceeded its proportional limit, you can get an arbitrary fluency stress by that method, the offset method. It's basicly a straight line on the stress-strain diagram, parallel to the initial linear part of the curve, but it displaces certain standard unit strain, in this case 0.2%. The intersection of the displaced line with the curve defines the fluency stress. This stress is obtained arbitraly and it's not a physical property of the material. However, it can be used as the fluency stress of the material.
 
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...
Back
Top