Calculating the Number of Lines for a Diffraction Grating

AI Thread Summary
To determine the smallest number of lines needed for a diffraction grating to separate a doublet with a wavelength of 4,750˚A and a separation of 0.043˚A in the second order spectrum, the resolvance formula R = λ/Δλ = mN can be used. Substituting the values (λ = 4,750˚A, Δλ = 0.043˚A, m = 2) allows for solving N, the number of lines. The discussion also mentions the Rayleigh criterion and provides an alternative formula for intensity, which is more complex and requires a deeper understanding of diffraction principles. Additional resources are suggested for further clarification on the topic. Understanding these calculations is crucial for effectively using diffraction gratings in spectroscopy.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
A spectral line of wavelength λ = 4,750˚A is actually
a doublet, of separation between the lanes 0, 043˚A . a) which is the smallest
number of lines a diffraction grating needs to have to separate
this doublet in the 2nd order spectrum?

To be honest, i don't know what to do. I first thought that it could have something to do with the Raylegh criterion, but even, so ##sin \theta \approx \lambda / D##, and i don't know what would substitute D here. I know it is necessary to show the progress made by the person that made the question, but i would appreciate any tips to realize how to start. Of course, the equation of maximum is ##d sin \theta ' = m \lambda##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can try the following formula, for the resolvance R.
$$ R= \frac{λ}{Δλ}=mN$$
Where λ = 4,750˚A, Δλ= 0, 043˚A, m=2 (second order), and solve for N to find the number of lines.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Charles Link
Post 2 is a very simple way to do it. Otherwise you can derive the post 2 result by using the formula ## I(\theta)=I_o \frac{\sin^2(N \phi /2)}{\sin^2(\phi/2)} ## where ## \phi=\frac{2 \pi d \sin(\theta)}{\lambda} ##, but it takes a little work to do that, and you need to know the details on how to work with this formula=it's a little tricky.

Edit: See https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/fundamentals-of-the-diffraction-grating-spectrometer/
for more details.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top