What is wrong with this flux integral?

  • #1
I think the issue is how I parameterize my vector field, but not quite sure. In case you were wondering, this is problem # 27, chapter 16.7 of the 8th edition of Stewart. Thanks for any help.

1651694133448.png

1651694182004.png

1651694211040.png
 

Attachments

  • math question.pdf
    832.1 KB · Views: 58
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Your problem is that you add an additional ##r## in your surface element. This is presumably because you think that in polar coordinates you need to use ##r\,dr\,d\theta## for the area element, but the ##r## is already accounted for in the cross product ##\vec r_r \times \vec r_\theta##. (Consider the flux of ##\hat j## through ##y=0## and ##x^2+z^2 \leq 1##, which should clearly be -up to a sign depending on normal direction- ##\int r \, dr\, d\theta## over the same ranges of ##r## and ##\theta## as you have.)

Generally, the surface element as parametrized by ##t## and ##s## is given by
$$
d\vec S = \vec r_t \times \vec r_s \, dt\, ds
$$
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and james weaver

Suggested for: What is wrong with this flux integral?

Replies
11
Views
810
Replies
5
Views
405
Replies
6
Views
555
Replies
6
Views
582
Replies
2
Views
542
Replies
3
Views
707
Replies
1
Views
337
Replies
7
Views
600
Back
Top